I totally miss hover-mode, and it sometimes takes too long to even get a mech/jet. But so far leaves a good impression.
The 'Greek' symbols that the article mentions are Cyrillic symbols... just saying...
It is loosely based on 'Journey to the West' - famous Chinese book.
Actually the lead designer of Enslaved is working for ND on this game. There may be a reason for that.
Who cares if the guys are zombies, mutated humans, or ants with a disfunctional growth hormone as long as the game turns out great. I for one haven't played a really great zombi-game yet, so i would take a Naughty Dog-zombie game any day. Art direction looks phenomenal - thats about all you can say with certainty right now. The rest is faith in Naughty Dog.
I like Uncharted a lot but i actually think that the first part was overall the best. I think gameplay-wise every iteration has become better and i don't see a lot of problems with it. But story-wise they shoot more holes in the plot every new time around. The flaws were moderate in U2 but really substantial in U3, which is sad because i play it for the story. Still i think it's one of the best, most fun games of this year.
If you see Uncharted as a multiplayer game then maybe there is reason to complain but as far as a story based game goes i didn't complain that the third Indiana Jones still wielded a whip, was hunting lost treasures and was even played by Harrison Ford who looked the same freaking way he did in the first movie. So, as long as the story is good and the gameplay is fun i don't mind another part. Also i prefer, no i demand, that they keep it linear too. Just look at Arkham City. Sure eve...
Very often those Codes have a nice small print under or above them stating their expiry date. It's also true for dlc-content from special editions and the like - at least on playstation. Yay for technological advancement...
That would be the best news they could come up with - ever. I am all for it!
I am partially with you on this. Sure tech develops further but i really do think - not that i necessarily like it - that the computation will be moved from your home to clouds and thus the device you are using to access services will not need to be at the cutting edge of technology.
But even if not (i am still a little in doubt as lag is concerned, but 10 years ago we wouldn't have dreamed of pings we have today) i think that when Moore's law continues to be effective we will...
Does anyone read the articles before complaining? Noone is saying that big scale games are leaving or that everyone will be forced to fumble around on touchscreens or that consoles will die. Well, ok, not noone, but at least not this guy.
All he is saying that the devices will change, become smaller, portable even. Look at the VITA and think about how much power a device of that size WILL have in 10 years. There will simply be no need for large scale consoles. You will still have Full...
Thats true but wireless electricity is already available and in 15 years i would be amazed if it wasn't a default for modern homes and thus the smartphone as long as in the proper area will not have a problem with energy consumption and new technology in batteries (forgot how it was called) is also out and should deliver more power on the go in a couple years.
He is not talking about tomorrow but for the foreseeable future. I am totally inclined that in 10-15 years we will have one portable device that does everything. I could even imagine noone having a big desktop-pc under the desk but one small portable device with everything one could possibly need as services on those devices. I don't think it is that bad an idea as long as the software for it doesn't dramatically drift into the angry birds and doodlejump direction, but i am sure it wi...
I think he is right. All he is saying is that portables in the forseeable future will have so much power that they will run your games. That doesn't exclude hooking it up to a tv or projector and playing real games (not those smartphone games of today) with controllers.
I really liked the online in 2 but played so much more hours in 3. Campaign was a little better in 2 though.
I think the campaign was better in KZ2 and the online was better in KZ3, even though i missed some of 2s online-features.
So, everybody is wrong. Right?
Apparently it may to be named 'Title Fight' - but after seeing this logo i am a little skeptic of the whole thing. Also the Twitter source of the images is deleted. However, Paul Gale had tons of infos on November 3rd, like Fat Princess, Parappa and Radec as chars, infos about stages, gameplay and so on:
http://paulgal...
What all the others said PLUS SONY still owns all the rights to Heavenly Sword, so if they want to, Nariko and Kai wouldn't be a problem at all.
Someone slapped the only available promo-image onto a box, added a rating logo - done. I am very sure this is not official or final. While the image is great, there are some reasons not to use it as cover-illustration. Mainly because the weight is off...