Nah, they don't need that. A PS5 home console and possibly unlocking their PS remote play app for all devices is good enough.
Nintendo tax, it's a joke. Was excited for the FF ports but not for that cost.
They need to have a toggle option for random encounters or open world spawns.
Also the same could be said with the battle mechanic. Bring in the let's go catch to level or an option for classic battles (I MUCH prefer classic battles but it doesn't hurt to have that option).
I am looking forward to this one, after let's go was a let down with the mandatory catch mechanic.
Looks like they got ride of the Pokémon appearing on the map and that stupid Pokémon let's go catch mechanic.
I wish there was a toggle to choose how you want to play between classic and the let's go. I don't mind seeing the Pokémon on the world. Makes it easier to check off your Pokédex.
I'll give it ago during a sale. I didn't play enough off the beta to really see the difference. Plus the next beta I'm not about to try. D1 was alright. But the engine game was stale.
Bet their over priced as well. Good ol' Nintendo tax.
I played the alpha and beta and I wouldn't recommend it. Felt bland.
How bad are we talking about?
Is 9 unplayable? Been curious on it as didn't play it back on the PS1
Only thing I want to know is how much Nintendo tax are they going to add to these?
If it's anything like Enix reselling their old FF games at £40, then they can gtfo
The zombies being bullet sponges really bugged me after a while. The other re games, believe it was code Veronica was completely about conserving your ammo. As you switch characters half way through keeping the ammo and herbs on the new player.
I remember spending all my ammo on a boss to be changed into a guy (think Chris? Can't remember) and having nothing but my knife. First thing you fight is a huge snake boss, you were meant to share the ammo. I had to quit as it w...
Did the survey, but the box at the end with comments etc was a tad restricting in length. Couldn't point out flaws or positives properly.
I played the alpha and felt the game would've been epic if it played slower like gears of war. That prologue with the lava and high cliffs was cool to walk through. But the high speed of the game really took it away for me. Felt like it was really trying to take on Destiny as its main aim.
Also, the home city. Why is it first person... Was such an odd choice.
Managed to get through 45 minutes of gameplay before never looking back.
It was an alright game. I paid like 6 bucks for it way back. It's an impressive looking game with an ok storyline.
The thing that got boring was...
Cut scene > walk a little > duck behind box > kill waves and waves of bad guys > repeat above X10. Level completed.
Is that the only bugs? I've put this on hold for purchase because the rumoured bugs. Didn't know it was minor things (I should've actually googled it).
One of the local stores in the UK had this for £10 brand new physical. But stock wasn't great near me :/
Really bad list. Like I've seen the best 5 or so reasons to get X over Y. But that list was just crap, and unconvincing.
It's affordable, well it kinda is and kinda isn't. You spend a high price, just to be able to buy experience software.
If you're looking to save money, the original Xbox > PS4 > one s > switch > pro > one X
The Xbox is the better bang for your buck due to cheaper games digitally and physical, plus Bc.
...
First thing that came to mind. It'll be a poor experience if it's just a clip for the switch in a plastic shell.
Ah, didn't know that. Already completed the game a and b scenarios. :)
Tbh for me a head start won't help either console. Seeing how this gen went. I'm going to go with my wallet over my friends. I went from online gaming to playing single player games.
So it's who does BC, who has the cheaper games and the better digital service for next gen.
I own the PS4 pro but sometimes envy the Xbox one X for the cheaper games, game subscription services etc.
Of course that won't be everyone's same view....