Imagine being so out of touch that you feel the need to defend a greedy company that is the second largest company in the world.
Sony can't operate PS on a loss unlike MS's Xbox Division. Offering AAA titles day one on subscription services is not financially feasible.
That's how aging works.
The best deals in gaming are 99% of the time in physical games.
The best case scenario is that nothing will change.
MS is incapable of managing its game studios.
Expecting things to get better for Activision under MS ownership is the same as expecting a miracle to happen.
Siitähän sä tykkäät.
Be that as it may, it's still not fun to play.
That's because the game requires concentration, map knowledge and skill.
None of that made any sense in the context of my comment.
Why are you talking about the story? Digital Foundry focuses on the technical aspects of the game.
Am I the only one who feels that this was a strange video for Digital Foundry? A very odd tone for a DF video.
Normally DF examines the technical aspects more critically and then compares the graphics and effects to the game's contemporary peers.
In this video comparisons are made only to Bethesda's previous titles. Which is a bit silly because of course the game is going to look better compared to a 5-12 year old game from the same developer.
Talk about delusional.
It didn't take long for you to forget that as an Xbox player, you are not getting anything more with this Zenimax purchase. Starfield would have released on Xbox regardless, even if MS had not bought the company. Yet here you are celebrating the release of a former multiplatform game as a some sort or victory.
Xbox players wanted more games from MS but instead they got smoke and mirrors. And you fell for it.
It bothers you more than the fact that MS ran your favorite game series to the ground? Halo is a mere shadow of its former self.
Without financial commitment? What? You had to pay for the service.
COD isn't big on PC.
Crossplay benefits PC the most because normally a new COD game would be dead within the first year of release on PC.
Ah, yes, the world's second biggest company is just an underdog in this race. Yes, keep telling yourself that.
That doesn't mean that the judge's family ties didn't influence the decision. Not at all.
How so?
Xbox doesn't get more games from the acquisitions. The games used to be multiplatform games that would have released on Xbox regardless.
By making them exclusives, MS isn't making more games on Xbox. They are just reducing the amount of former multiplatform titles on other platforms.
It's a lazy trick.
@Ryuk&2007
Hah, talk about out of touch.