You are 100% missing the point.
It isn't the fact that he disagrees. It's the fact that he disagrees because he's INVOLVED with the game. Not only that but he fails to disclose that he's involved with the game when he goes and straight up lies to people on Reddit, saying that he's purchased the game.
It's the equivalent of writing a book, then going to Amazon and creating 10 accounts to say how great you though the book was.
So, not only have you stolen all the images from the article that we wrote, not given us as much as a link, but you've also entirely guessed that it will be exclusive and that it was going to be shown at Microsoft's show.
Literally NONE of those details have been mentioned by anyone.
Yes, but that's the point. The article details exactly why that is a problem.
Fillers? But...absolutely nothing is known about the game other than the title. I don't understand how you've made a judgement already?
And yet strangely enough, my Xbox One (and at least the Xbox Ones of 10 of my friends) all seem to be working perfectly well.
A few people reporting faults on a shipment of a million plus consoles (because obviously, entirely normal and expected manufacturing defects do occur) does not equal no QA.
Child of Eden.
Fruit Ninja Kinect.
EA Sports Active 2.0.
Kinect Sports.
Kinect Sports: Season Two.
Haunt.
The Gunstringer.
Diabolical Pitch.
You're welcome.
I can buy Facebook likes and accounts off the shelf. Wouldn't take a genius to set up a voting bot.
Not saying that's happened - the Xbox One probably got whooped fair and square - but Android is right. This does seem a little strange. A console that's in the top 5 of every preorder chart of every major retailer only pulls in 5% of the vote? Even thought the PS4 is at the top of those charts, it doesn't seem right or logical.
@rainslacker - "Also I find it rather odd that MS would give a random employee of GS information that they haven't given to the press."
They didn't. All of this was confirmed in multiple places. The only problem is everyone is passed caring. They're all straight out for Microsoft's throat.
Microsoft has confirmed multiple times that trade ins will be allowed at "participating retailers" (Gamestop, GAME, CEX, pretty much any...
Things required by this article:-
1) Spellcheck.
2) Grammar check.
3) Rationality check.
It's been in development for longer than some of the other titles at the show. Thief's combat looks absolutely nasty. They're going to have to put an awful lot of polish in to fix that up.
Which is why I state that later in the article. What you quoted was under the "what people generally think" portion.
They would be the same for the 360 edition, which is £40. ;)
Already got two, thanks, but not everyone has that luxury.
Limited by space unfortunately - we could only choose five. I narrowed it down from 11. :)
Yes, of course we're aware of that. The title is quite clearly "Five PS3 Exclusives We WISH Weren't PS3 Exclusives."
As the article says: "Of course, there are many reasons why these games weren’t even considered for release on the 360. We’re just dreaming away."
"You are literally claiming that Kinect Rush 2: A Cartoon Network Adventure, Harry Potter (multi-platform), Adidas MiCoach, Sega's London 2012 , and sequels to Your fitness evolved and unannounced DC3 are GAME CHANGERS for Kinect????"
Harry Potter is not multi-platform for a start. The game is actually CALLED "Harry Potter for Kinect" - but don't let facts get in your way.
Gaming is not just about hardcore experiences. Yes, Crimson...
Wow. Paranoid much?
"They literally know less than the average gamer who owns the device. Basically if you look close the site seems rigged to take jabs and undermine Kinect more than cover or promote it."
Well, we own and have played every Kinect game released in the UK, and all of the Xbox Live Arcade titles. We know enough, thanks. And when have we undermined Kinect? OUR WHOLE SITE IS ABOUT KINECT. How would attacking our prime platform make ANY ...
Was this review written by a child?
I didn't think that was the case, to be honest. The Witcher 2 has absolutely no chance - as good as it is.
Agreed.
Though the argument doesn't hold water if the reviewer has written hundreds of reviews over the years. Doubt anyone would put that much work in just so they could make a "bias score" for a game that was only announced six months earlier.