Yea, let's be honest, they delayed it because of Mass Effect 3. Which sucks, because I too am looking forward to SH HD, not so much Book of Memories because I do not own a Vita (I'm lacking the green paper this month) :(
Umm, no, it was delayed (again), go to the Amazon page for it, says March 20. I can't vouch for outside the U.S. but here in America, it is the 20th.
Yea, change your gamma in game, or mess around with brightness and contrast till it suits you, these options have been around for years, lol.
Silent Hill HD isn't releasing March 6th, but rather March 20th, just saiyan.
This petition is extremely old. Blizzard said they will not change it, no matter how many people sign it. And with consideration, 64k signatures is nothing in comparison to the amount of people who will buy this game (and how many of those 64k will buy it as well). I, personally, like the art direction of it and I think this argument was a thing of the past. Once you are playing it, you won't constantly say to yourself "I hate this because of how bright it looks" but rather &quo...
@Megaton
Oh well... that just sucks... I'd still probably buy ME3 anyways. I already use Origin for BF3, so what's another game then, it still doesn't rival Steam for me. I just won't buy Mass Effect right away, because I am cheap like that (might have considered it more with another copy of BF3).
I thought the Winter Olympics back in Salt Lake City was a decent game, not great, but decent. From my experience with the other ones, they are rather mediocre and not worth picking up unless super cheap. One would think, since they only make these games every 2-4 years, they could at least be good enough to purchase.
Yea, considering much of those come with the same DLC, such as all the Razer products, then it won't cost 870 to get all the DLC....
@Chris W
Unfortunately, hard copy or otherwise, for the PC, you will need Origin for BF3. I can't say about ME3, because EA hasn't clarified necessity for it yet.
I could see this working IF they price it right. Say, if they separate the SP/MP and sell them separately, pricing those at a 50/50 split could work, so that when/if the gamer wanted to buy the other half, they aren't screwed of their money. But we'll see, I wish there was a better way to combat used game sales, but there really isn't a good option for it yet.
It's "the best version everywhere" or "the version Microsoft pays to get first" in regards to ME1 and ME2? Have you played ME2 on the PS3? It is running the ME3 graphics engine plus it has virtually all the DLC yet the 360 version is the best?.... I personally will buy it for the PC, because all my game saves are there, but really, the game is solid on both consoles and PC. Please leave your fanboy comments at home.
It's because he copy and pastes the same crap in every article, even ones where the PS3 "wins" in every aspect. He is pure trash and one of the worst fanboys I have ever seen. And yes, that is primarily why I avoid Lens of Truth, while their original idea is nice, the site is a breeding ground of trash and scum.
You are right, Rockstar doesn't go, they have their logo tattoo'd on exec's arms.
But yea, they do create their own hype, which I actually appreciate more. Hopefully we get something good.
'In A Few Months' Time... aka E3.... let's hope before though
You don't even know, those QTE events are DIFFICULT. /sarcasm
http://www.gamebandits.com/...
Your article doesn't link to the right story/article, here is the correct link
I fail to see how sitting on the toilet with a photoshopped iPhone has anything to do with this article. Maybe he likes to play games while sitting on the toilet? Maybe he explained this in the article, but I didn't wanna read it.
@Kurylo3d
Steam is free on the PS3 if you purchase Portal 2, there is no other method of obtaining Steam.
As for the article, personally, online passes really don't affect me. I buy all my games new (but not at retail price, screw that) and so I don't need to deal with the used game market. I understand how it could suck for some people and I see how it benefits the business, but for me, doesn't bother me.
As far as Xbox Live/PSN/...
That article was an opinion article on whether or not 2012 will be a good year for PC gamers. It's intentions were not to tell us about lesser known games. The downfalls and advantages, as per my understanding, were to give the reader some background knowledge on PC gaming in general. From my perspective, the article did exactly what was meant to do, which was stating the opinion of a writer on whether he thinks 2012 will be a good year, which was a yes.
Fairly positive this article was made to generate hits, especially an article with a negative hit on a popular title, a recently announced title at that.