photoshop.
OH LAWD :D
because you are...
From my understanding, they didn't want to have a huge gap between PC/XB1/XB360.
I think they want it to be comparable across all platforms, and focus on the gameplay and fun factor rather than push the graphics just for the sake of it.
And since when did graphics become top priority?
T.T
The inclusion of a female soldier of the Chinese PLA will make this an interesting dynamic. I wonder how DICE capitalizes on this. Pretty unique so far and I'm loving the dialouge.
A lot.
It's mostly likely an old build. I played Ryse and I liked the graphics but wasn't blown away. I'm betting the finished build will be very different.
That goes for every other game there, Dead Rising 3 being the most fun I've had playing a game in a long time, to Forza 5 being the least graphically impressive.
I wish the consoles could completely remove the HUD. I could only take away the map, ammo counter, health bar, and kill feed. The objective icons were still there. Even so, it was still fun.
Killzone has the best shooter controls? Don't make me throw up.
They're smarter than me :o
Just in case he missed the first 20 shots.
I want battlefield 2143
I just see it as improving aspects of the game that were lacking. Playing Battlefield on next gen consoles closer tithe PC than ever. Going back and playing Bad Company, I'm glad they improved the infantry gamepla.
So what does it mean if I enjoy a game? Am I not being affected in any way?
So?
ME2 was awesome. I don't know why you thought it was a letdown.
I guess player based destruction and maps that can change play styles on a map with 64 players complete with land air and sea battles is just like every other shooter then /s
Seriously, do you want to go back to playing corridor shooters or games that let you play any style you want?
I think Battlefield has the best/funniest beta bugs as of late.
@ninjagoat
What extra? They cost the same as current gen games.