you don't do games that have anything to do with politics?
what do you play then?
cod's out, mass effect?
no, there's politics in that, about how governments are slow to act.
hell, you can't even play tetris.
wasn't that about workers being treated like pieces to be used and then discarded.
what can you play?
i think you're stuck with nintendo.
yes, the old "what's sex, or your sexuality, got to do with gaming?" line we always hear.
funny, because how many games include romance options these days?
and it's not like it's even a new thing, you remember Donkey Kong?
little jumpman, out to save HIS GIRLFRIEND.
there have been romantic relationships in gaming, since, well, the very beginning.
but only when it's gay is it a problem.
to play as Daenerys with her dragons.
seriously, i reckon by the end of the books, some time in 2067 probably, Daenerys will become one of the key figures, well, her and her dragons anyway.
i don't know about a controller, but it might make a cool watch.
if they don't make the games people want to play, people won't buy them, simple as that
i want one.
i've got carts for all those systems, so one machine that can play them all, and with a handy HDMI output, that would be just perfect.
they releasing this in the uk?
i'd like one, but dayum, way out of my price range.
maybe when i win the lottery. ^_^
those two overreacted, quite a bit.
Levine didn't deserve the reaction he got.
but they behaved no worse than many gamers do towards anybody who dares to suggest there's sexism in gaming.
every time the subject is brought up nearly all the comments are attacking the person the person suggesting it.
seriously?
feminazi? i guess we all know why you only have one bubble.
funny how there's not one word ab...
i read it, and it's bullshit.
whoever this wally is seems to think people give their games to gamestop for free.
"That’s opposed to the sale of a used game which benefits exactly no one financially but Gamestop, making pure profit on it, and the consumer, who gets a cheaper game."
it's written by an idiot clearly.
it's one of those articles
"That’s opposed to the sale of a used game which benefits exactly no one financially but Gamestop, making pure profit on it, and the consumer, who gets a cheaper game."
wrong, wrong, totally frakking wrong.
pure profit?
people give them their old games for free now?
because that's exactly what you're implying with that ludicrous statement
what about the people w...
good point.
i've always said realism should take a back seat to gameplay, i guess that should apply here too.
i should probably go play some more DCU online. ^_^
i'd love one, but it'd be a nightmare if it broke down.
and it's a shame it looks like it's made of cardboard.
the first two statements were quite enough, but they had to add the third. ^_^
i still wanna know how they're planning on balancing the game, the thing that killed Superman, or put him into a healing coma if you prefer that version, how is anybody gonna fight Doomsday?
how would a non powered character like Catwoman last more than a nanosecond against somebody like doomsday?
i know they can balance the game from a gameplay persepctive, but when they've got well established characters with such vastly different strengths, i don&#...
still can't compare to capcoms resident evil revalaitons mix up, that was on the spine of the case.
^_^
they're wrong because this always on crap is preventing people who have already bought the game from getting what they paid for.
they've taken their money and not delivered on their end of the bargain.
they're quick to bleat about how preowned is taking food from their childrens mouths, then they pull crap like this where whenever their servers go down, and this is ea we're talking about, they will go down, people can no longer play the single...
why do people even still listen to the guy?
pachter i mean.
for when russion roulette isn't dangerous enough for you. ^_^
you know, i'd forgotten about that.
scee seem to have discovered an effective tactic for making people forget about stuff like this.
just absolutely refuse to even address the issue.
never reply to any comment, just stick their fingers in their ears and hum a tune.
eventually people give up asking because in the end, you'd have as much response from asking the wind why it blew your washing off the line.
it annoys me th...
you can view marriage however you like, but you don't have the right to force your bigoted views on everybody else.
you know what, i don't even care if your view is based on religion.
what makes your beliefs so important just because they involve some mythical deity?
why do you think that means your beliefs can overrule my rights?