HardCover

Member
CRank: 5Score: 10110

Alternatively: These people have more market data than you do, and would choose not to get in serious s*** by blatantly lying to investors just to bamboozle a bunch of pimply faced young adults on the internet.

4798d ago 4 agree4 disagreeView comment

Dude bro. This wasn't the entirety of Microsoft speaking. Read the article. Get the context. Don't be so foolish. I mean, it even says it RIGHT under the title. The title is just a title. It's not what you should be judging the content on.

4811d ago 6 agree5 disagreeView comment

Didn't even read the one question. Go ahead and read it. You'll see how completely idiotic it is to say "no" in response to that. It's remarkably stupid.

4811d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

When's the last time you ran mods? In Skyrim I just install whatever the f*** I want and it pretty much works without flaw (unless of course you download clearly conflicting mods).

4812d ago 6 agree1 disagreeView comment

Flavor: You can turn that down slightly and get 50+ fps on a typical gamer's PC. This is not the most taxing mod out there.

4812d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

With the Slayer of the Lifeless from Naxx.

Noob.

4855d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Actually, no, that happened a few weeks ago with people being able to crash servers.

This is more like the old Kazzak kiting, which is more hilarious than anything. You can always go to a different major city or zone in a situation like this, where it's just one guy in one town.

4855d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

That's the dumbest shit I've heard all month.

Time to go unplug my internet and check if the sun still exists.

4930d ago 12 agree1 disagreeView comment

Why would I be excited over anything with the name "Square Enix" that isn't Final Fantasy Versus XIII?

4930d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

People who say Kotaku isn't credible aren't credible people.

They're always the people that have never visited the site, refuse to read anything they say, and assume it's bad 100% of the time.

4933d ago 7 agree14 disagreeView comment

If you don't like an article, browse around for another.

Haven't been here for a year, but I'm glad to see a lot of idiots still can't figure out that there's more to this site than the front page.

4933d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment

These people still went to school for programming. They have a perspective on tech that you most likely don't have.

I'd sooner trust them than the sarcastic guy without credentials.

4942d ago 12 agree4 disagreeView comment

My friends and family aren't completely ignorant, so I don't really get that issue.

But hey, if ya'll want to clutter this crap fest with more crap, go crap around all you'd like.

5072d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

What I don't understand is why people go on N4G to talk about random stuff like this. Go hit up Twitter, Facebook, your parents or friends if you want to talk about it.

5073d ago 1 agree5 disagreeView comment

IT'S COMING IT'S COMING IT'S COMING!!!!!!

"The release date, suggested retail price, and other details for this game will be announced in the months ahead."

Wait, months? Damn it, Blizzard.

5091d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I did.

They were fun games, but I didn't feel much emotion during my playthroughs. Besides, I wouldn't call the storytelling "beautiful," not by a longshot.

5093d ago 12 agree8 disagreeView comment

Well, with an argument like that, it would be impossible to disagree.

Thank you for enlightening me.

5094d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

They won't. They'll put it on Nexus or Workshop.

Duh.

5095d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Online achievements are the absolute worst. After a certain amount of time passes, they become literally IMPOSSIBLE to get. If someone chooses to pick this game up 6 years from now and enjoys collecting achievements, then they shouldn't be punished simply because they're late to this particular party.

Developers should stay away from crap like that.

5095d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

PC already has some good examples of clothing animation because of PhysX. it's a bit more subtle than how well facial animation can look, but it's definitely going places.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

5095d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment