got_dam

Member
CRank: 5Score: 68760

Tech land has had some issues with the sequel. I'm thinking they hoped this would get them some quick funding to pump into the development.

1679d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yeah, proven lies ruined him, so obviously he is a total ass hat... right? I can't believe people are still riding him like that. In fact, it has been proven that it was in fact HE that was the one being abused. But once accused, forever guilty. Cancel culture is cancer.

1682d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

This article is 3 paragraphs long. One third of that is just a block quote.

1683d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

That /\

1685d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Microsoft nurtured bethesda a lot over the years. Their first console port was Xbox exclusive. They said themselves that they developed oblivion for 360 and ported it to PS3. They have done the exact same thing with every one of the Bethesda game studios games. Microsoft and bethesda have been in bed together for 20 years now. Their broken ass games are even more broken on Sony systems almost every time. Skyrim was dumpster fire on PS3 at launch, and for a painful amount of time after.

1685d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

Taking 3rd party games from other players.... I'm sorry... I just don't even. All bethesda games are now first party. It's that simple. I don't give a shit about bethesda, xbox, or Sony. Just saying Microsoft bought bethesda for a shit load of money and they became first party studios. I am honestly surprised the exclusive move came so quickly, though. I really expected Microsoft to let bethesda publish some of these already announced games on their originally planned platform...

1685d ago 2 agree5 disagreeView comment

Games journalists. Days gone is a good example of why they suck. 93% user rating. 73% critical. Game was #1 for a month straight in UK. Was well recieved commercially. IGN would have you believe it was the worst game of the year.

1686d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

I want it to be good. I do not believe it will live up to its funding and development time. Hope for the best, though. Loads of people have obviously sunk a a ton of money into it.

1686d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

It sucks for the PS owners... or I suppose it does. I have been consistently disappointed by Bethesda game studio games since skyrim. They focus so much on make a game you can see everything in on one super playthrough. It leaves it feeling like there is not much in the way of stakes. I'm hoping that this deal will give them more money and time to do what I know they are capable of, but haven't accomplished is over a decade.

1690d ago 5 agree9 disagreeView comment

Meat punks*

1692d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Nintendo has been metrAVOIDING telling the fans anything for a long time now..... oh man, I'm sorry. Thats probably the worst thing I have ver said.

1692d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I dont see the point in not having combat in first person. Maybe I'm missing something.

1694d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I love this game. The between mission dialog triggers at weird inopportune times. The mission flow is..... strange. But damn, I love this game.

1696d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Same. Its too bad, because it is a lot of fun for the brief few seconds between the jenk.

1697d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well, looks like it is still stuttering.

1698d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Scalpers. There, save some time.

1701d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Agreed. Stealth games ALWAYS get controller. Anything where precise movement speed is a requirement. Keyboard leaves you with walking speeds of too slow, or too loud. No in between.

1703d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

If this was not a $60 game I would be all over it just because what is here looks DAMN impressive for 20 people. But I can't justify the price for what the game is. It is looking a lot like THQ Nordic isn't too dissimilar to og THQ.

1708d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well, it was financially very successful. But yeah, that's an extremely misleading sentence that should have been cut.

1713d ago 4 agree2 disagreeView comment

Already did.

1717d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment