Factual, I come to read comments and I just SMH at some of the things thrown around from both sides.
Does anyone of you have access to Microsoft’s figures, contracts with developers, and can take me through a step by step process of how game pass is handled from a business prospective? It’s the same rhetoric day in and day out. I understand a lot of people here hate Microsoft, and it’s understandable, but how can we have a clear understanding of sustainability if no one truly knows how it all works, and we get bits, pieces, and opinionated prejudices about the subject?
Did anyone read the entire document MS released ( treat that question as rhetorical)? It’s too much emotional reactions relative to partial statements being shared. Not only is the information incomplete, it’s being interpreted by people, who are admittedly bias and uneducated to Microsoft’s process, compensations, and contractual agreements with developers. Then try to pass it along like they’re experts in the subject at hand. I wish we focused more on facts instead of these optioned emoti...
Correct, the Xbox has a form of hepatic feed back. Is it on the level of Ps5? No. I can’t deny this though. Ps5 has the best control hands down this generation. I just hope they don’t abandon the creative aspect of it.
I with you on this one. That’s too much feed back for my taste. The whole game is one big song
Naw, the way this game is setup it would actually be dope. I wouldn’t want it to vibrate too much. Like I said earlier the game does a great job staying in beat even the character snaps, and stays with it in idle. It would be great if the vibration’s sensitivity was based upon a completed combo.
It’s better, but the game does a good job staying in rhythm
I mean, it’s logic when it comes to any other company, but it’s an issue when MS does it (builds its case.) It’s way too many emotional comments with no real facts to back it up. Just cause a company says something doesn’t make it factual as specially in the court of law. After reviewing the evidence so far the FTC needs a stronger case.
Not only is it old news, but also known business practices. It’s only magnified because it’s “big bad M$.”
@_steakdeck_ thank you for proving my point
Right, but people will read it for reaction purposes, not to comprehend.
I stopped there too. it’s just another opinion piece that’s supported with little to no facts. Wasn’t Netflix apart of the same baseless opinionated speech as well as Apple Music? Whats annoying is everyone seems to be an expert on the subject, and pass along their bias rhetoric you know the vibes “ oooooooo it’s not good for us gamers/consumers/musicians” 🙄
If I was Sony I’d at least talk to MS. The reasoning is simple, the FTC’s case at this moment is weak. Don’t take my word for it go read about it. The first 5 pages were more speculation than proof of it being anti consumer. Aka FTC doesn’t have any hard evidence.
I’ve been waiting to try this
Pentiment caught me off guard the most. At first it dragged, but I’m happy I gave it time.
The game’s style reminds me of jetset radio future. The soundtrack, the way the game syncs with the beat, art style, and humor. I honestly wished they did a reboot of Jetset
It looked fun, now the demo that was shown was boring, but hey let’s get it
I’m going to try it, but to be honest games like this don’t age well.
Yup, I wonder if they’ll offer cross play in the near future.
So if someone, in a court of law accused you of something, you wouldn’t ask for evidence, you’re just gonna take their word for it? Sony has pushed some strong allegations, and asking them to prove it is desperation?