gerbintosh

Trainee
CRank: 5Score: 47580

Bear fucker! Do you need assistance?

923d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

.

923d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Not getting my money this time. Should have been black ops

923d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

It was London and Botswana. Really close but London edged em out, barely

931d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

This is what happens when you keep backwards compatability

934d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

They are trying to save time and money. Little early in the tech cycle to solely rely on this but maybe in the future

935d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Woosh

936d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Most look homely

940d ago 1 agree4 disagreeView comment

This is the cost of consumers wanting backwards compatibility.

940d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

I remember that when there was a rumor of Sony buying Take Two a bunch of the MS supporters on this site were against it. But now, those same people are ok with this.

947d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

They need spoons so they can eat ass

948d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

No Man's Starfield

948d ago 4 agree2 disagreeView comment

@Crimsonwing69

"let me ask you this, how is having one company pay for exclusivity for a game not as bad as one company buying a publisher to make games exclusive"

Because there is still competition for the exclusives. Don't like it, pony up more dough or find a better way to make your console/services more appealing

"or in this case still allow the game on a competitor platform, but make it cheaper on their platform?...

948d ago 8 agree6 disagreeView comment

Surprised this new IP isn't being made by Microsoft Studio's. Oh wait, they don't make new games they just buy them

951d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

This ruling has nothing to do with setting up store fronts. It had to do with allowing publishers to let consumers buy through another payment portal or to even let them know that they can purchase their products via another option, not just Apple. Apple does not allow publishers to advertise this.

Also i'm pretty sure once this precedent has been set companies will be coming after microsoft and sony as well

955d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I didn't realize forcing companies to use their payment service had anything to do with making their product. Especially when the only reason for doing so is that they can then extort them for their 30%. Last I checked the price of an iPhone is marked up 300 to 500% of what it cost to make so it's not like Apple is begging on the streets

955d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Slow news cycle

955d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

His company is losing the competition so therefore he wants to remove exclusives to get rid of competition

962d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

You just blow in from stupid town? Sony licensed the rights from the MLB. MLB, as the rights holder, wanted the game on more consoles, because more money, and forced Sony to make it for more consoles or lose the license. MLB was perfectly fine with exclusivity until they thought they could make more money without it

970d ago 15 agree3 disagreeView comment

$1000 PS5? Please don't lie to try and make a point. You can get a PS5 on Amazon, right now, for $500 . Also, the PS5 was in the mid $400 a few weeks ago and that one came with a game

974d ago 7 agree1 disagreeView comment