Any site with Xbox and PS in the name is probably authorized by either of the companies. So yeah, I would question them
They need to change or upgrade their game engine. The characters look lifeless due to their eyes
Time MS wasn't willing to wait on. IMO I don't think the feature is coming to the Series S in the future. No point since the game would have already been released for a while and Series S customers would be used to not having it
No need to buy it. Just get a month of gamepass and try it out. If it sucks then you saved $55
Didn't the developer state that all DLC would be free? What changed that
These is what people get when they try to release a console for $299 that is not specced like the switch
According to PCGamer it is a 4 player co-op game. I would assume like Left for Dead.
https://www.pcgamer.com/a-n...
Bear fucker! Do you need assistance?
.
Not getting my money this time. Should have been black ops
It was London and Botswana. Really close but London edged em out, barely
This is what happens when you keep backwards compatability
They are trying to save time and money. Little early in the tech cycle to solely rely on this but maybe in the future
Woosh
Most look homely
This is the cost of consumers wanting backwards compatibility.
I remember that when there was a rumor of Sony buying Take Two a bunch of the MS supporters on this site were against it. But now, those same people are ok with this.
They need spoons so they can eat ass
No Man's Starfield
"I mean why would anyone want to explore barren land on foot?"
Just because you don't does not mean other people don't want to. The option to do sonwould be nice. NMS gives you both options, for example when it comes to flying between planets and solar systems.
You can fly for 14 hours, real time, to the next solar system or instantly warp. So I don’t see how Bethesda couldn't do the same.