i'm glad at least that fans got to get it started off by paying to fund it, if Sony did this first it would never be coming to PC.
It's a bit sad that Sony only funds it now that it hit its goal so fast, they should've listened that so many people wanted it from the start.
This is getting funded extremely quickly, not so surprising though. There may even be another game after this, not so sure they would bring a new one out after so long only to have the story finish there.
The problem is Doom is supposed to feel like Doom.. not any other game, the new Wolfenstein got the feel down of feeling like Wolfenstein.
But this game, I'm not so certain.
For some reason i didn't get much of a Doom feeling from this, the graphics look good though.
I don't know, might be judging it too early but it had a slightly generic feel. I still hope it's a good game though.
Still holding out hope a new L4D is shown at E3 as well!
The specs seem vague for the processor, 6 core cpu as in actual 6 cores from Intel, or AMD cores?
And 24GB of ram? jeeze, i thought having 16GB was lots as it is, but then it is a tech demo. Playable games don't even need half that amount of memory so far.
Hoping the new Doom turns out good and has online co-op, if a Source 2 game is revealed it will be the icing on the cake for me.
Also looking forward to AMD's Fury cards, though the 390x looks like it's going to be a simple rebrand.. Some guy did an unboxing of it and is already selling his 390x on Ebay, doesn't speak much for how good they will be. Let's hope the Fury/Fury x is good at least.
60fps or greater isn't much of a problem these days, at least not for higher end mid range cards like the 970. Some games need a 980Ti like Witcher 3 though, at 1080p anyway.
Not exactly a smart thing to have it titled Sonic Boom after the flop of the first game.
The DS Rush games were very good, SA1,2 was good. How can they screw up the formula? For a 3D title take what made the SA games good, for a 2D title take what made the best 2D games good. Can't be so difficult surely.
Still have mine, seems to have turned a bit yellow though.. Don't remember leaving the sunlight hit it.
That's actually great. I can now demo games and if i hate them just get a refund. Wish i could get rid of Dead Island, it's certainly no L4D or KF2 standards.. ugh.
I have a Retail copy of 7, no idea if this upgrade is in OEM style.. if so i guess it's a good thing that i just upgraded to x99 if it has to be tied to the motherboard.
SolidStateSnake, you get away with this comment with no consequences? If i had said something like that i would've gotten a bubble down for being immature or trolling.
The double standards on this site are astoundingly pathetic, shows how many console lovers defend this place.
The best way to see and feel the difference is to play a shooter on PC, open the console and limit the fps to 30 and try playing, then unlock it or limit it to 60+ and play again. For me games begin to feel and look laggy once they hit below 35fps, in fact i would say the absolute minimum should be 35-40 with averages above 60. That gives the best smooth experience if not wanting to sacrifice details in new games.
This is pretty easy for any girls, show most of your boobs in the skimpiest outfit possible.. get attention.
So what else is new, yawn.
I believe this is going to affect PC most, that's why i recently went x99 and got a 5820k, 6 cores with 12 threads clocked @ 4.4ghz.. beast of a cpu.
New clip? I already seen this a little while back, it's not new.
Be interested to see how the game turns out though. They have the music spot on at least. Too bad they won't make it a mature title like Conker was.
This is why I've been saying 4K is just a buzzword right now, even on PC it's not very viable. High end cards only run games @ 30fps average with dips below 20fps often. 1080p and 1440p with 120hz/144hz are much easier to run and give fluid fast frame rates and are much better for games for a few years yet. Not surprising to me that it will be 2 generations until consoles get 4K running.
That would be nice, but the problem is mobile chips are always a lot lower powered compared to desktop processors due to heat. So mobile chips will always be behind by quite a margin.. That is, unless/until something revolutionary pops up.
The Shield is supposed to be decent, but it still heavily relies on streaming from your PC rather than strong dedicated hardware inside it, so it's not ideal.
I think most people are going to find it difficult to switch to another service, especially if they have been using Steam for many years like i have and already have built up a friends list.
Wouldn't a refresh imply they increased speeds of the cards? I think clock speeds got a tiny boost, that's it. They literally rebranded old 2xx series cards.
Fury/Fury Nano/Fury x are the only new cards worth looking at, i see little point in the 3xx series if someone is looking to buy one, may as well just get a 2xx card now instead.