John Carmack maker of Doom said that Doom 4 would run at only 30FPS on next gen consoles.. so you have a point.
But then, i'm only interested in Doom 4 if it's like the originals and not the scare fest that is Doom 3, and has awesome online co op modes etc..
No, integrated graphics are rubbish. I currently have a laptop with a 5870M card in it and 6GB of ram and i can play Black Mesa at 60FPS for most of the time, in some sections it feels like it's around 40 or so. that's a class 1 graphics card on a laptop.. an integrated card is terrible for gaming.
We don't need demanding games, we don't want games that take 2 years for a new gfx card to run it at 60FPS.
Games should tax newish hardware enough so we still get a constant 60FPS.. or it's bullshit. Mainly Crytek make shit like that.
I said on another site a while ago that it looks like a mode 7 game from the Snes..
oh well, not much into pokemon anyway i actually think its sort of boring.
Custom Robo Arena or whatever it was called on DS was much better, at least you could actually control your character and have fights.
I used to own a Sam Coupe computer until i moved house and it went missing, along with my mega drive, amiga 1200 and super nintendo and all their games..
I checked ebay not long ago and apparently Sam Coupes are very sought after, they sell as high as £500+ i am pretty pissed off.
if you want shit framerates be my guest.
1080P is enough, i am fed up with these BS articles.
Look at the new video interview about the Oculus Rift, even the guy working on it said you need a decent rig to pull 60fps with that thing and it's not even out yet.
Let's stop with the BS, people who own multiple screens and go much above 1080P will have much lower framerates and also be laggy unless you play much older games. Multi GPU = micro stuttering also.
Get one mid-high end...
SSD's are getting cheaper, you can get a 256gb drive for a good price now. There is literally no excuse not to have one if you own a Gaming PC.
Load times of games improve a lot, even loading maps online.
Since they want to keep a console as cost effective as possible tho they prob wont use one.
Similar to this/last gen, as in Xbox may have the better GPU and PS4 may has a better CPU. So they kinda balance out to be near the same.
I'm interested in the consoles, but nothing really so far is different enough to not want to game on a PC which is better.
I'll see what games are being made for the consoles, i'm betting Xbox will have the usual boring Halo rehashes though.
I miss games like they had on the 64, Banjo Kazooie and Conker.. something unique with adult humor instead of the same bs over and over.
Maybe i'm off MS consoles because i much prefer FPS...
More BS articles, look at pc gaming and bad system hogging games like Crysis, you would be lucky to get 40FPS on a mid-high end graphics card, speaking of which.. sometimes we get mid range cards within 10% of the performance of a high end one that costs a lot more. So if a game runs crap on the mid range card it's gonna on the high end one. Nobody wants games that take 2-3 years for a new graphics card to play it 60FPS at med-high settings.
I remember back in 04 when i b...
Vita is quad core 3DS is dual, in pure speed terms Vita is roughly 800mhz or more in total clockspeed while 3DS is nearer 500mhz. Vita could even be 1ghz total if each core is the same speed as 3DS. The Vita GPU is also quadcore.
For comparisons of graphics see Uncharted to Mario 3D land or Resi Revelations like you said, theres quite a difference. However, being a different style artwork on 3DS makes their games look vey good anyway, either system is good enough to produce g...
Well i'm a PC gamer but from what's been said recently the 720 will be more powerful.
Er no, by your logic then because it'll be cheaper it would be even more outdated.
try 1,000 for high end, for 700 you'd get a good mid range one tho.
Well I won't arguewith Valve, they make the very best FPS games. Not like overrated companies like Bungie with Halo etc..
Plus PC is the home of FPS, where they belong.
The best FPS developers ever:
ID Software (at least for Doom) Return to Castle Wolfenstein.
Valve: Half Life series, Left 4 Dead series, Portal series.
Early Rare: Goldeneye 64, Perfect Dark. (literally the only FPS games worthy of console...
if they have Conker next gen or some great funny adventure games like that i will buy one for sure, as it stands its always the same boring stuff like Halo rehashes. Thats why i never game on anything other than PC, why bother with most watered down console games when PC has awesome ones like Half Life?.
oh well hopefully MS can innovate with Rare this time, if not i might just see what games PS4 has.
framerate would suffer hugely anywhere near this res with even best vid cards, 1080p is the way to go
XBL should be free, i wasted most of my XBL sub because i got bored and ended up just playing my PC. XBL is a slap in the face not being able to play online when PC has an awesome free service Steam.
god.. more FPS games on Xbox, that's why i never play my Xbox anymore.. FPS games should stay on PC where they are best.
I may actually wait and see what PS4 offers, i can't stand FPS games on consoles.. the controls and framerate and everything are just not as good.