Well the (timed?) exclusive of tomb raider was a surprise however otherwise they have a point.
Sony aren't preventing the games pc release, they are assisting a 4 man Dev ream that make the game AND it's not a fucking sequel. You are not comparing apples to apples even worse is that square announced the game at E3 as if it was multiplatform but clearly Ms feel they need to try and challenge uncharted which frankly is a pretty futile and petty mission.
And what pisses me off even more is square announced this game at e3 as though it was multiplatform wtf that about...
Well this decision is pretty stupid really based on the way market share is getting if it does release on ps4 in 2016 (what about pc?) then I won't be buying it full price although I'm sure I will live-uncharted will in all likelyhood be a better game.
How can this have been in development for 2 years longer than Titanfall. Activision said this was in development for 3 years. We know rescan worked on Titanfall since it formed the studio righ back in early 2010. 4 years ago when rescan were working on the Vietnam 3rd person Cod they canned. Common sense guys. More like this was an idea zampella and west had before the money disagreements that meant half of them or more left for ea and respawn entertainment and they decided to move forward wi...
@thegreatmelon I think he is talking about the idea of quantum computers and getting abit muddled. The idea that you could have computers doing.multiple processes at the same time with a bit being both on and off at the same time. Ofc I struggle to see computers ever working this way as can you imagine trying to programme for that it would be mind boggling. far more promising is IBM's recent prototype of a pc where an electrolyte is used to conduct the electricity and power the machine i...
Hmm and thing is you can generally get ps4 cheaper than the 399 rrp.
I'd rather an emphasis on better gameplay experience and systems. Better Ai etc than 4k but whatever.
/hmmm well xbox isn't going anywhere the RRam sounds like sane business sense as it could generate alot of money especially if it really is as simple as they make out although i'd say ps3 has at least 2-3 more years on sale.
No they couldn't without fucking over everyone that alreaady got one. Would defeat the point of it being a games console...
Alos he doesn't lie to her find the video recorders in the final level.... they make it pretty clear she isn't the first and that they aren't all that well trained nd have hacked more than a few peoples brains open on the off chance it works... The certainty of her dying vs the possibility of a cure isn't good enough odds in my book to just kill someone especially not when there aren't all that many humans left. You are either as close to certain as you can be that it will...
@Lawson72 I don't think coop is avilable in all misions, it's it. 's own seperate campaign of missions plus it still seems to have incredible depth in the E3 commentated video the guy mentions "adding a murder mystery to his quest log" so I think it's gona bit more RPG style than before :D
@butterscotch Microsoft wouldn't bother, waste of their money-better off getting eclusive content which they have done (I hate the practice-they started it I wish sony hadn't continued it but nvm wont make any sane person pick one console over the other just pisses off and punishes gamers.)
Yeah and the psn store said Watch_Dogs ran 1080p 60fps preemtively so either its a mistake or sony are playing it safe as some people threw shit at them over that. But lets say this is true right? and it's only 720p on ps4 then what is it on Xbox one? 480p? I somehow doubt it-it'll be 900p or 1080p on both. Seeing as Watch_Dogs almost certainly suffered from developers being fragmented between console generations and last gen consoles clearly needing more work to get the game running ...
You realise there is a disclaimer that states that "game experience may differ during online play" on EVERY game. Songs actual advertising never said if they were referring to singleplayer or multiplayer.
@death no temporal reprojection isn't upscaling the difference is an upscale frame/image is generated in a lower resolution THEN stretched. If you are using temporal reprejection the frame is only ever generated in 1080p the adding of pixels is done prior to this and is based on past frames. Whereas in other upscaling the frame is upscale by adding in pixels post generation. So if say there's a pixel of value 2 and a pixel next to one another generally a pixel value of 3 being added I...
They won't have to settle because native means the frame isn't upscale and Killzone frames aren't upscale. They simply are using an algorithm to generate pixels based on where that pixel was in the previous 2 frames and it's motion. It requires less of the hardwares power todo this than to regenerate all the pixels every frame. Despite this the image outputted isn't stretched andni a 1080p display will be 1080p and wont require any upscaling.
The perks and guns make me passed off. Not because I want it free but because i dont think guns and perks should ever be paid dlc.
I agree new weapons and perks shouldn't ve paid dlc ever it messes with the feel of the game.
It's not a good move by Ms though surely for square Enix to agree the money they had to pay will likely FAR exceed money they make off a few.more xbox sales