excaliburps

Contributor
CRank: 71Score: 1210680

Leaks mention it's campaign only, with the MP most likely being released after or next year (like MWR). What's weird is the MW2R getting pre-order bonuses or is it not that weird?

2189d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

And witty...

2190d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

I gather, maybe they're prepping it for PS5/Xbox Series X? That would be an ideal scenario, no?

On topic, this is a nice move by the community.

2190d ago 6 agree1 disagreeView comment

It's not that bad. I mean, it's worse tham BF1, BF4 and BF3, but it's still a solid shooter.

2191d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

Indeed. I only want N64 so I can play AKI wrestling games. LOL!

2191d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

Bruce Campbell, baby!

2191d ago 11 agree0 disagreeView comment

@ilikestuff Yes exactly. It would be a challenge to juggle pleasing the veterans and the new players since there's an element of give and take there. The old fans' numbers might not be enough by itself ot make it profitable. I guess we can use H-Hour as a good testing ground for it, no?

2192d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Oh yeah! On PS5? This would be INSANE! Imagine 256 players, big maps! It's like if Battlefield and battle royale had a baby. I can see it working. Which studio can make it though? Zipper is gone.

2192d ago 9 agree1 disagreeView comment

This is a weird one, to be honest. Devs will want to rope in new players, which means they'll need to speed it up a bit, which was what happened to SOCOM 4, no?

2192d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Game was ahead of its time to be honest.

2192d ago 11 agree1 disagreeView comment

Indeed. Not confirmed yet though but if it is indeed for PS5, perhaps this is one of Sony's surprises.

2193d ago 6 agree8 disagreeView comment

I hate that video game pulishers are so obsessed with growth that anything but growth in every fiscal report is considered a "failure." Let that sink in, that kind of business model is not sustainable long term. If studios stop pumping out stuff like these, they run the risk of the parent company's ire, and thus, heads will roll.

Just the entire economics of gaming is hard to stomache sometimes. Of course, games still being at $60 for decades now has something...

2193d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

For me though. I have bought cosmetic stuff before but mostly to support studios. Example would be I bought a skin pack for Titanfall 2 since Respawn announced early on that there will be no map packs or Titans tied to MTX, which they honored.

2193d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

These are whales that Acti is targeting. $280 just for COD Points is insane (at least for me since I'm not filthy rich). Why though? Unless you plan on buying every cosmetic bundle they release, it's pointless since the Battle Pass works in such a way that completing it, will grant you the next one for free.

2193d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

For MP, I loved BO2. BO1 as well. Overall, BO2 was pretty well balanced and I liked that it had the Target Finder scope for colorblind people like me. XD

2195d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

My theory? If true, this is because Sledgehammer and Raven were supposed to take point on this. When things went south, Treyarch stepped in and rebooting or retelling Black Ops 1 is the easiest route to take.

2196d ago 6 agree1 disagreeView comment

Not bad. I'm personally playing COD: MW, BF5, Titanfall 2 mostly. :D

2197d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Kudos to IW for even adding it in. Haha!

2198d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

It's super annoying that every patch, there's something that gets broken. Like, really broken and it's on every platform. Before this, PS4 users had that Spec Ops download glitch. Xbox One version was crashing, etc. Sigh.

2202d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I hope this sees the light of day. :)

2203d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment