excaliburps

Contributor
CRank: 71Score: 1205710

I hope he does oversee stuff and it's not just a title where he delegates everything.

175d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

You didn't see the developer resume image that's there?

180d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

No, WB doesn't want anything fun since suits want live service garbage for max revenue. LOL!

Shame. If we are getting any Batman games like these, it'll be years away.

212d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

No way in hell GTA6 isn't at least $80. Now I can see it being $100. Yeesh. =(

227d ago 15 agree0 disagreeView comment

Isn't Stellar Blade AAA?

263d ago 6 agree2 disagreeView comment

People really be hating for the sake of it. Yeesh.

269d ago 21 agree2 disagreeView comment

Yep. Lack of engagement and not a lot of players outside of its first week. Not a good sign.

If a publisher doesn't tout its sales or players in the first week, chances are the game underperformed.

364d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

LOL! He's blonde now.

428d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Insane. 20K for a sex doll. Might be the perfect definition of a gamer with too much money. LOL!

468d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

LOL! Exxxxcellent...

468d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

Agreed. This is like forcing players to buy a new one every other year.

470d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

I think they should have learned their lesson by now.

471d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

Nope. Won't work. Even if deactivated, it will still show these ads/news thingies.

480d ago 9 agree5 disagreeView comment

Man, don't mention Outlaws and this in the same breath. LOL!

483d ago 7 agree6 disagreeView comment

"It's to stop people buying it really cheap and then just upgrading" -- yes, and they took that away and you're OK with it? No wonder Sony can pretty much do anything when it comes to pricing. LOL!

483d ago 31 agree9 disagreeView comment

Exactly. Save on money but compromise quality.

486d ago 14 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yes, we should believe some anon user instead of the EIC of a respected financial gaming publication. LOL!

487d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yep, but you had people believing that crap. I mean, websites ran that. I don't think they believed it themselves, but the urge of Concord, bait and traffic seemed too good to pass up.

487d ago 12 agree6 disagreeView comment

I don't think EA would be foolish enough to try NFT's, and other BS with the next one. I mean, they cannot afford to given the stuff the past two games' have pulled.

488d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I think it was more of a case by case basis? But I think people assumed it would be required for MP games, but not for SP.

488d ago 6 agree8 disagreeView comment