Wow, look at the ps3/360 fanboys go at it like there's no tomorrow. As soon as Gabe says "No", everyone jumps on this guy like a pack of hyenas. Then try to predict the future like how he's gonna fail if he doesn't work with PS3, or how he won't work with the PS3 because the games will be crap.
"Keighley: Are you guys working on PlayStation 3 here now, trying to understand it, trying to get better at it?
They can do as many WWII titles as they like. What has been done to death are WWII games that use the same FORMULA. Think about it, how many times have we played a COD/Medal of Honor game based on WWII, a ton. How many times have we played an RTS based on WWII, not many. What about sandbox WWII shooters, not many either.
This is why I'm getting sick of COD/Medal of Honor based on WWII, I've played that formula too many friggin' times to even care. Battlefield on the other hand, I...
Look at all you guys trying to bash Valve, again coming up with BS that just seems to fitting to you only. You know what you guys remind me of, Simple Jack, that's right...Simple Jack.
"Bu...Bu...Mamma! Dey said dat they dun like dat PS3 no moe!!! Dey said du...du...dumb tings about dat PS3 mamma!!!!"
Let me make more sense of what's happening, and hopefully you will comprehend this. The reason why Valve doesn't develop for PS3 is because they are a small t...
This is especially true on N4G, no matter how many times we've explained to the Valve haters the reason for not developing for PS3, they will always bash valve for being "Too lazy" and "Too Whiney".
Valve is a small development team and it wouldn't make any business sense to develop for the PS3. It's not because they can't do it, it's because there are no benefits developing for the PS3.
This is their attack on MS. If it was Sony who made this OS and cost the same as MS would charge, people would call it simply brilliant and would never mention the free OS's...at all.
Why can't some people just give credit to MS for doing something right this time instead of going "DUUURRR ZEE UBUNTOOZ ISH SUPERER THAN ZAT WINDOW LULLZZZ DURRRR!!!"
Can someone explain to me why xtremeimport is getting more agrees than disagrees? This is a typical fanboy bash at the 360, I don't know understand why this isn't in the Open Zone.
I started laughing when I read up to this point, "I just dont see long time gamers being legit when they own a 360". Typical fanboy nonsense.
You make a good point. I don't know whether or not it was a good idea that Bale changed his role for Connor because I don't see Bale as the terminator, I actually see him as Connor. I was actually expecting to see that big guy who's cast in the movie, only to find out his head was replaced by CGI Arnold. However the main terminator wasn't bad either.
Regardless, this definately wasn't Bale's best, I'm sure he could of done better. I just really think since McG was under the helm,...
I reread my post and if I sounded a bit harsh to you, I'm sorry, we're entitled to our own opinions.
I just think that (IMO of course) if Connor had screentime for 3 minutes and being the voice of the radio during the entire movie, it would of been worse. When I went to go see the movie, I wanted to see a Terminator movie about John Connor. For me I was disappointed in the fact that it was more about the terminator than Connor, but of course the story had to make some sort of sen...
Arrogant? Sure it was shocking to hear how Bale flipped out at one point, but I think his rewrites are the reason Salvation was at least OK (IMO). I think he even saved it from being a total disaster.
Seriously, did you honestly think this movie would be better if Bale just acted it out when it was under the control of McG, who did Charlie's Angels and the writers, who wrote Catwoman, yeah...Catwoman.
I remember back in the day (of course most of us lol) when there were cartoons like Transformers, G.I. Joe, Bugs Bunny, Thundercats, He-Man etc... Now today you have this garbage as cartoons like Pokemon, Yu-Gi-Oh (sp?) and even the new Transformer cartoons suck major bawls.
The only cartoon in the 2000 years that I've enjoyed watching was Justice League, I thought that was kick-arse.
The real comparison will be to see the games in motion, not still shots. Sure I see some little graphical improvements in ME2, but ME1 was already an amazing looking game IMO.
The real difference however is that the game runs much more smoothly as the devs claim. To me THAT'S the major improvement.
Seriously, why was it necessary to put a "Top 5 - Best Console Graphics"? We've already seen the games so we can judge for ourselves. Articles like these bring nothing but flamebait and hits to this site.
I'll admit I did hit the link to see what HIS top 5 were, so I am kind of guilty lol. By the way I would replace Gears 2 with Mass Effect.
I think the reason why movies like Doom, Blood Rayne etc... fails is because there are so many things to cover and the movie ends up being rushed. Yes a big problem is the director too, but when you play a game for a whole day, how long will it take you, 6 - 8 hours? How long is your average movie, 1.5 - 2 hours? The movie has to live up to expectation within that time frame and there are things in the movie that end up changing stuff, or missing stuff.
Did that squid just put its tentacle between her?...ummm....nevermind. :/
They can do as many WWII titles as they like. What has been done to death are WWII games that use the same FORMULA. Think about it, how many times have we played a COD/Medal of Honor game based on WWII, a ton. How many times have we played an RTS based on WWII, not many. What about sandbox WWII shooters, not many either.
This is why I'm getting sick of COD/Medal of Honor based on WWII, I've played that formula too many friggin' times to even care. Battlefield on the other hand, I...
Look at all you guys trying to bash Valve, again coming up with BS that just seems to fitting to you only. You know what you guys remind me of, Simple Jack, that's right...Simple Jack.
"Bu...Bu...Mamma! Dey said dat they dun like dat PS3 no moe!!! Dey said du...du...dumb tings about dat PS3 mamma!!!!"
Let me make more sense of what's happening, and hopefully you will comprehend this. The reason why Valve doesn't develop for PS3 is because they are a small t...
aha! hahahahahahahahahah!!! Oh wait you're serious. Damn I thought they said the poll was a joke!
This comment is very true.
This is especially true on N4G, no matter how many times we've explained to the Valve haters the reason for not developing for PS3, they will always bash valve for being "Too lazy" and "Too Whiney".
Valve is a small development team and it wouldn't make any business sense to develop for the PS3. It's not because they can't do it, it's because there are no benefits developing for the PS3.
I think this will be interesting to some of you.
http://www.gamespot.com/use...
This is their attack on MS. If it was Sony who made this OS and cost the same as MS would charge, people would call it simply brilliant and would never mention the free OS's...at all.
Why can't some people just give credit to MS for doing something right this time instead of going "DUUURRR ZEE UBUNTOOZ ISH SUPERER THAN ZAT WINDOW LULLZZZ DURRRR!!!"
Can someone explain to me why xtremeimport is getting more agrees than disagrees? This is a typical fanboy bash at the 360, I don't know understand why this isn't in the Open Zone.
I started laughing when I read up to this point, "I just dont see long time gamers being legit when they own a 360". Typical fanboy nonsense.
You make a good point. I don't know whether or not it was a good idea that Bale changed his role for Connor because I don't see Bale as the terminator, I actually see him as Connor. I was actually expecting to see that big guy who's cast in the movie, only to find out his head was replaced by CGI Arnold. However the main terminator wasn't bad either.
Regardless, this definately wasn't Bale's best, I'm sure he could of done better. I just really think since McG was under the helm,...
I reread my post and if I sounded a bit harsh to you, I'm sorry, we're entitled to our own opinions.
I just think that (IMO of course) if Connor had screentime for 3 minutes and being the voice of the radio during the entire movie, it would of been worse. When I went to go see the movie, I wanted to see a Terminator movie about John Connor. For me I was disappointed in the fact that it was more about the terminator than Connor, but of course the story had to make some sort of sen...
Arrogant? Sure it was shocking to hear how Bale flipped out at one point, but I think his rewrites are the reason Salvation was at least OK (IMO). I think he even saved it from being a total disaster.
Seriously, did you honestly think this movie would be better if Bale just acted it out when it was under the control of McG, who did Charlie's Angels and the writers, who wrote Catwoman, yeah...Catwoman.
I loved Beast Wars as well, but I didn't like Beast Machines though, that one kinda sucked.
I remember back in the day (of course most of us lol) when there were cartoons like Transformers, G.I. Joe, Bugs Bunny, Thundercats, He-Man etc... Now today you have this garbage as cartoons like Pokemon, Yu-Gi-Oh (sp?) and even the new Transformer cartoons suck major bawls.
The only cartoon in the 2000 years that I've enjoyed watching was Justice League, I thought that was kick-arse.
The real comparison will be to see the games in motion, not still shots. Sure I see some little graphical improvements in ME2, but ME1 was already an amazing looking game IMO.
The real difference however is that the game runs much more smoothly as the devs claim. To me THAT'S the major improvement.
Seriously, why was it necessary to put a "Top 5 - Best Console Graphics"? We've already seen the games so we can judge for ourselves. Articles like these bring nothing but flamebait and hits to this site.
I'll admit I did hit the link to see what HIS top 5 were, so I am kind of guilty lol. By the way I would replace Gears 2 with Mass Effect.
I think the reason why movies like Doom, Blood Rayne etc... fails is because there are so many things to cover and the movie ends up being rushed. Yes a big problem is the director too, but when you play a game for a whole day, how long will it take you, 6 - 8 hours? How long is your average movie, 1.5 - 2 hours? The movie has to live up to expectation within that time frame and there are things in the movie that end up changing stuff, or missing stuff.
The same thing with movie ...
Think about it, if they lowered the price of harddrives, then there would be no point on purchasing an xbox bundled with a hard drive.
Say if a 120GB HDD is lowered to $120, would you buy an arcade and that for $320 or an Elite for $400.
Hey Gump, great points, oh and don't forget the Microsoft Games for Windows label on each game box.
No doubt Sony won, because they have a great number of exclusives shown at E3.
However, MS wasn't bad either, but I know if MS won that award, this site would have an explosion bigger than a nuclear bomb.