hey chavez
as of last month this game as well as any game depicting any form of violence is illegal!!!!
It was you who pushed your "congress" to pass this anti-gaming and anti freedom of speech legislation. So if you are really interested in this game perhaps you should think about letting your fellow venezuelans buy it without the fear of going to jail.
peace
you have a good point. It is a bad precedent. I hope they do not do the same thing next gen.
I feel the same way about the horrible precedent Sony did when they eliminated BC from the Playstation 3. I mean, is the Playstation 4 not going to play Playstation 3 games?
just because millions of people love baseball or basketball does not make those games good, but they sure are good to the people who love them.
if you dont like halo fine, but don't try to ruin it for the people who love it please.
i don't blame ms for it.
now we have the internet, with hundreds of gamer web sites and blogs. They are probably more responsible than any company of spreading the console war.
and besides i remember arguing with my friends back when i had the genesis and they had the nes. If we had had the internet, it would have been worse.
why do you blame MS for that?
Eurogamer is biased. They prefer the playstation 3. Sony paid them ... this is a conspiracy.
o my i sound like a Sony fanboy, ...lolz
shuts up and continues playing splinter cell, which is awesome by the way!!!!
thats because there are much more gamers now than last gen. The market is much bigger.
and please do not pretend that ms has not been a real competitor for sony this whole gen. in fact i bet that before the playstation 3 came out, you, just like the majority of gamers, thought ms did not stand a chance, and look at them now. its been four years and sony is still neck and neck with ms.
and by the way i am talking about the console market.
I respectfully disagree with your analysis. Having all those franchises that used to be exclusive for sony, has done a great deal for ms. It is probably the main reason it is such a tuff competitor this gen.
take a look at the difference between sony and ms in terms of market share in these past two gens. Ms has managed to significantly cut into sony's market share.
if ms did not have the games u mentioned, i would have probably already bought a playstation 3.
well sony has not been able to convince me to buy a playstation 3
so i doubt they will change my mind at e3 as well
(bring back bc, and ill buy it in a heartbeat)
as for ms, i am not convinced with Natal, so its make or break. if they cannot convince the consumers with this tech at e3, i predict that sony will make significant headway, and beat ms for the number 2 position this gen.
(By the way i think that even though ms has sold more conso...
the coach bag is probably more expensive than all those games put together dude.
In hope that all the sony fanboy haters come out and say that they are going to get the pc version, just like they do in EVERY post were they announce a game coming to the 360 and PC only.
i have heard this before.
A game with good score, which up to now is only going to come to the 360 and PC.....
let me guess: here comes the SDF haters to ruin the fun of xbox owners and tell us how they are all allegedly going to get it for the PC, and how the 360 version sux.
i wish they would also tell us that they are going to get the PC version when the game also comes to the Playstation 3...but you know they wont because they are a bunch of hypocrites.
PS: I know there are a...
sorry try again
Byonetta was rated lower because of performance not graphics!
it ran horribly on the playstation 3 because the port was crap. The graphics were mediocre on both consoles.
peace
@syronicus
"they get a pass"
lololololololololpolololololo lololololololololololololololo
hahahahahahahhahahahaha
like there were not hundreds of articles ripping ms a new one due to the RROD.
it cost them 3 billion aprox,
to this day every time i read a post form a sony fan, you make a point of bringing it up.
how many people bought a Playstation 3 because they did not want to replace...
let me try to explain.
the hate stems form the fact that it is ported to the playstation 3, and it seems that it looks a bit worse. If this were a sony exclusive, it would be fine. It is all because of this stupid console war.
sony fanboys are a bunch of arrogant haters period. (360 fanboys are silly also, but not nearly as arrogant as the sony crew. at leats here at n4g.) I am refering to fanboys not fans, there are lots of sony fans here which i respect.
...
this has nothing to do with ms
read the article before commenting
fanboy
@alpha
great comment
we need more level headed people like u in n4g.
there are too many fanboys, and we know they are fanboys because, inter alia and as you pointed out, it is obvious that they did not even read the article. they just immediately reacted negatively because they read the title and it is not pro-sony. even worst, i find that the article is being critical because the writer respects the company and wants to see it improve. it is iro...
As a gamer, and 360 fan, i feel that it is irresponsible and premature to compare these problems . The RROD is probably the worst console problem in the history of video games. Sony's "problem" has yet to have a serious impact. I say we wait and see.
And for all u fanboys laughing at this, there is nothing funny about fellow gamers getting scr*&wed this way. I hope that Sony solves this problem immediately and you can go back to your games.
I ha...
with all due respect,
those are two very different things. Sony got sued because it advertised and sold the specific feature they later removed. In other words they took something that people already bought. Regardless of how little you think poeple used the feature, the fact is the feature was sold.
On the other hand EA is telling you this before they sell u the product. So if you buy it, you know their is only one online code per game.