"picked Nintendo as a publisher"
Seeing as how Nintendo was the only one that offered...why are you mad at them?
I guess I'm the type that is perplexed that out of all the games coming to Wii U, some people claim to only like one and whine when they dont get it.
And it's not like this is the first time this happened. Final Fantasy, Banjo Kazooie, Killer Instinct...All these were once nintendo only games, but have switched platforms due to either funding or platform popularity. It happens. If you dont want it to happen then the game needs to be supported. If the game wasnt suppor...
For those disagreeing....exactly how many post have there been about Nintendo going software only or making games for phones or Sony.....yeah. A lot.
" the wii u is a complete failure with zero third party support and sub-par last gen graphics. Its only major games are rehashed sequels of tired franchises. "Get over it". "
Except the games that arent rehashes and the games other people want on sony, microsoft, and portable devices?
I mean really if the only game you're interested in is Bayo, then it sounds like you dont have varied taste in games.
It's not like continuously explaining a situation to people who keep asking the same question for over a year is annoying, right, guys?
While I love my Wii U and will be ecstatic if it's announced for that platform, I seriously doubt it'll go that route. Symphonia chronicles didnt even get on Wii U...
3DS and PS3 seem much more likely...but I'll keep my fingers crossed.
Maybe late spring/(early/mid) Summer. I know the game can be patched later, but I'd rather have a great product from the get go.
It's 6pm eastern.
Seeing as how they made a profit on each gamecube sold, I'd hardly call those bad years. That said, while I do think the Wii U will do much better in the future (I'm looking forward to it), I also hope their next system will do better at launch. I'm pretty sure it will since Nintendo should be used to HD development by then and will have learned their lesson on marketing (I'm still upset they didnt market W101 better).
"Why is Iwata still employed?"
Because Nintendo is still profitable?
Because he was a driving force behind the wii, ds, and 3ds?
Because the one console they're having difficulty with (Wii U) is being marketed better and is starting to gain speed even AFTER the release of the PS4 and XBone?
I mean really. Nintendo has one "bad" year out of decades of success and people start losing their minds.
The Gaara one looks the most like the character.
I want one but I'm waiting for better battery life and cheaper memory cards.
For perspective, I'm more of a Nintendo and Sony guy, but the headline blows things put of proportion.
Wait about 2 weeks = no fee;
wait 2 days = fee.
You're not paying to get the console fixed, you're paying for having the process expedited (i.e. you get higher priority compared to non-paying and get placed ahead of them in a sense)
That sounds reasonable imo.
...I just cam here to read the comments
It really is an amazing game. THe pros of the game far out shine the flaws. A master piece imo.
He's made exclusives for several systems, though...
Come on dude. I love my wii u and all and I honestly think it will feel weird to play symphonia on a sony console after the many times I played it on wii and gc, but the guy has a point. Namco is a business and all the people who work there need to feed themselves and their families. They cant constantly make investments with little promise of return. They can only afford to take so many risks.
Ps3 and ps4 are low risk and high reward. I cant be mad at them for going that rou...
I know, right? Everyone got in a tizzy when launch wii u games (many of which were ports) were only slightly better than the end of the previous generation.
That being said, I have high hopes for the future of all three consoles. I'm certain all have hidden potential.
I'm surprised Final Fantasy XIII didn't make it in...I still claim Fang as my waifu, though.
The game comes out in two months though...