Oh lord a few of you are stock market stupid.
I have Mario and COD Black Ops 2. Mario was okay, but I liked it a lot less than the Wii Mario. I'm a big fan of some games from Nintendo, but nothing releasing soon leads me to believe I should have just waited for either a price drop or to buy it cheap second hand. The only game coming up that I'm going to buy is the Lego game, but other than that I'm left waiting for a mario party/kart, Zelda, DK, or Banjo game. I really was foolish for buying it, but I have to have all the new...
To be honest my biggest regret thus far is the Nintendo Wii U. Not anything worth playing right now after Mario, and nothing interesting coming up. Right now I'm trying to resell it at market value to recoup the cost and then maybe purchase it down the line after a price drop.
A close second is the regular Nintendo Wii system. Bought it played it barely and it sat gathering dust.
I'm torn. My girlfriend owns an Xbox 360, I no longer own a ps3, but I have a badass gaming computer. I can hardly wait for the game, but I also don't want to ruin my computer GTA V experience by already beating the game on Xbox 360. For once in my life I'm gonna have to suck it up and just wait for it to come out on pc.
I'm a PC gamer myself Akuma, but what is the point of your post? It has absolutely nothing to do with the article, nor does anyone care about your PC specs in a comment section about the ps4.
$3000 gaming PC? This isn't 2001. I have a $1,100 PC that makes console versions of games look like they were being played on a Playstation 2. PC's aren't nearly as expensive to get great results as they once were. Not the point of the comment section or anything like that, and this comment has nothing to do with the game and how it will look console vs PC, but I just felt the need to point out that it doesn't take $3,000 to build a gaming beast. Also pretty ignorant of you to...
I'm not sure to be honest. I've never been one to buy used games, for whatever reason if there is a game I want to play it gets purchased relatively right after it comes out. I'm not one of those people that can go back and play a game a year old just because it is now 24.99 used at gamestop. I imagine I'll survive, as I can't trade in or play used games on my computer. I would be less likely though to buy games I'm on the fence about used though, but that doesn't ...
Loved both three and two, never played one. I thought two was hard compared to three, and personally I think two took a lot more creative thinking that three, although on a fun level three is the more fun game, but just barely.
@f789790146
That is a lie if I've ever heard one. The only way your $150 video card handles skyrim @ 60 FPS on Ultra is if you are playing at a resolution of like 800X600 and have the lots set to 5 or 3. If you have the lots set to 7 there is absolutely no way you aren't full of shit.
I disagree, the difference between the 60 FPS I get on high setting and 30 FPS on ultra setting I just can't notice to big of a difference with. I do notice it moving very slowly (obviously) but it doesn't hinder game play at all. With that said though, the difference in graphics from ultra to high really isn't that much and to be honest, the screen shots pre release made this game seem better graphically than it really is. The game is great, but the graphics are definitely just a...
I'm fine with something just more powerful than the current systems of ps3 and xbox because...well...I already have something that is much more powerful than the xbox and ps3 probably combined. The games on the Wii U are great fun, that is all that matters. It's not like people buy Wii's to play the GTA's and Uncharted's, they buy them to play Mario, Zelda, Metroid, Donkey Kong, etc.. PS4 isn't out, when it is, I'll buy one, but I definitely don't regret purcha...
I run it on Ultra at 2560X1440 and my FPS are anywhere from 28 to 34. The game play is very smooth even at those frame rates. GTX 670, i5 2500k
I won't get Call of Duty on PC because it just seems like the type of game that will be completely exploited by glitchers and hackers on PC. Battlefield started to get that way and I quit playing that as well. But just the general maturity level of most Call of Duty players leads me to believe that PC Call of Duty would just be a complete waste of money. I did however just buy it for the Wii U, hopefully it plays well on the Wii U, but for PC I'll stick to BF or CS for shooter, but I ...
I have 2 GTX 670's at the moment. Each was 399 no tax so $798. But there is a $1000 gpu called the GTX 690 which is just for the wow factor when my dual setup can match the output of the GTX 690 for $200 less.
Of course I'm doing it on a shitty 120hz TN panel, but until a 120hz IPS panel comes in. 120hz for FPS is awesome, even if it is on a color inferior TN panel. I did however just purchase a Catleap monitor from Korea, it will be my first IPS panel monitor, excited to see it in action.
30 FPS isn't okay when you get used to 120 FPS with superior graphics. Obviously that is with $800 worth of graphics cards, so that is unrealistic for consoles next gen, but anything less than a solid 45-60 FPS will be a joke in my opinion. The problem with that is that unless the parts can be made cheap the consoles will have to be very expensive again. Just going from a computer perspective, you can't run 45-60 FPS without spending at least $200 on a graphics card at 1920X1080 resol...
I agree, even at $250 I'm going to pass. I would use it as a computer monitor mainly when I am playing my ps3 on my normal computer monitor (has much better input lag than my samsung un6400d television which I also do not use the 3d function on). The 3d isn't much of a interest to me, but it doesn't hurt that it is there if I ever want to try it, and the speakers also make this thing appealing, but even at $250 it is still to expensive. $199 is a better price for its specs, but I ...
How is this thing as a computer monitor?
Jealous of what? A terrible sub $500 gaming computer that will probably manage to play most games on high settings at 30 FPS. WHOOPIE, if I wanted to play at 30 FPS I'd buy a console for less that $500. Sure lets go ahead and throw in a crappy PSU that will probably have your parts blown up in months, a crappy processor. I mean all of these parts are outdated, why on earth would people spend $500 to get outdated crap when you can up your budget a little and at least put some decent parts ...
I hit disagree because my most anticipated for ps4 is not GT6