Wait until you see the ending ;)
It's just as valid a conclusion as the ones that say games make men more sexist. That is to say not at all.
Well you don't HAVE to pay your TV licence. I mean technically, legally I suppose you have to but.....
Probably one of the best games on Dreamcast
It depends on what the publisher pays for.
Kotaku calling something else bad is like a pot calling another pot a pot.
Best not to push yourself David, you struggle enough writing a normal length rpg.
And one gigantic reason not to be: EA.
Also, Shrek.
I should have expected as much considering that Oblivion on PS3 was riddled with bugs, one in particular was apparently brought on just by saving the game (Shum Gro-Yarug falls off a bridge and dies (the pillock)). Though I think this affected 360 users as well.
I wouldn't have minded if they had patched the bugs out, but all we got was "If you want the bugs patched out give us another 40 quid for the goty version, oh btw this is the only way you'll get any dlc out of us ...
I'd be more concerned with it becoming another ME3.
Though we know that no matter how huge and glaring andromedas flaws are going to be it's still going to get perfect scores and droves of articles fervently defending it's shittiness from the "progressive" media. Of course the advertising money from EA will help as well.
From the picture I thought for a moment he was Yahtzee.
Skyrim was that bad?
Everything on Kotaku, ranked: 0.
Because Zelda games aren't really RPGs, they're more akin to adventure games. It's like calling Fallout 3 an FPS, while technically not entirely wrong, it has more in common with an RPG than an FPS.
The reason I think Mario Maker worked is because it's probably not that far from the devkit Nintendo uses to make 2D Mario games. Zelda is quite a bit more complicated and wouldn't fit into a "maker" game quite so easily. Not impossible mind, but I imagine mor...
If you count the particular subset who keep trying to inject politics into games without actually playing them as "gamers" then then the results of the study are correct, though not entirely truthful.
As soon as I saw the headline I thought to myself "I bet this is some drivel from kotaku."
And lo and behold I was correct. Go me, I guess.
No thanks, I stay as far away from NeoFAG as possible for fear of catching the stupid.
@Lighter9
I know I certainly am
I'd say it most definitely depends on the person. I agree that young children should not be consuming violent media, though there are children who are perfectly capable of telling the difference between fantasy and reality. Obviously we can't tell which children can and can't so therein lies the problem.
Personally I've been playing games that have been considered violent since I was young (younger than 10 I'd say and 31 now) and I can't stand real world violen...