All Channels
Popular

dilbig5

Member
CRank: 5Score: 10720

Why point this out? Besides Nintendo, Xbox One has the least amount of "free to play" games.

3544d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Sucker Punch would of been a good one to make it.

3618d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

@thisgamer
Doesn't change the fact that people are getting 2 different copies of the game for one price, PC and Xbox One game. 2 completely different sets of devices.

@ninja
A little different since it was only on PlayStation platforms. They mostly only did it with non-AAA and some indie games. Very few third party AAA games did. Only ones I can think of was AC4, Advanced Warfare, and Battlefield 4 but you had to pay extra for those.

3624d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Even more so on my point, hardly any lesser known games are on sale on Xbox One. The user base doesn't demand it.

3625d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Always wanted to try it. Hopefully it runs pretty well.

3625d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Women are people too lol. Idk why people still find it surprising when women can do something like this just as good as us guys. Best player on my friends list that plays Overwatch is a girl, she stomps everyone we play with in the medals/stats.

3625d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Wouldn't that cost Microsoft alot more money? That's pretty much saying they will gladly pay develops twice for 1 copy of the game. It's good for the person who buys it but is kind of a bad business tactic for Microsoft and developer. They'll need the sales of the Scorpio to be that much more if they do that. Which, if all games would be cross buy, wouldn't likely happen.

3625d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

As in the free games? Or the online? Cause Live wasn't too much better and still isn't if not worse

3625d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Never said they were only making software for consoles but if people already have a good PC, there is literally almost no reason to get the console unless someone else is playing the other. Quantum Break already proved that. It's almost a waste of resources for Microsoft to release the Scorpio. You can't compare mobile markets to video game markets. It's an unfair comparison. There is not a strong percentage of people who own an iPhone and iPad. Just because they exist doesn't...

3625d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Never noticed.

3625d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Nice. Always see this in YouTube but never played it.

3625d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Assuming you already have a One by the article, you're only point in buying one is the smaller size. It isn't a bad reason cause the original is huge but seems like a waste.

3625d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Kinda sucks the multiplayer from 2 isn't included. It was really good and fun.

3625d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Fable 3 was alright, co op was better than 2's. The Order definitely didn't live up to the hype but it wasn't a bad game.
Pro Skater 5 was bad.
I feel like Battlefront met up with its hype. I played it for a good while before playing newer games.
I really like Unity. Of course it had the bugs of an open world game and multiplayer was bad at first but I loved the game itself.
Destiny, I think, exceeded its hype. At least until you beat the game...

3626d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Ehh, took me some time learning some things when the beta/demo was out. It wasn't that hard. Either that or I was just really good at it and really bad at dark souls.

3626d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The mobile marker is a lot different than the PC/console gaming market. For a phone you can just upgrade after awhile for sometimes no extra cost but still pay that contract. They still make money from contracts, still make new models, and still get money from newer models. The same would not work for gaming machines. They need the support from console sales to support the production for the games being made for it. If people have a PC that plays the same game, theres no point in buying the c...

3626d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

#1. Only good for a small minority that would own a decent gaming PC, a Xbox One, and an expensive laptop for gaming.

#2. It's still a war with their own platform. Either they will buy a game for their PC or their Xbox One. Whether you can pay once to get both is irrelevant, unless you actually go out to buy the One to play it. Play on PC, you only give them $60. Buy the game and (if you don't have one) the Xbox One, you give them at least $360 or close to it. And t...

3626d ago 3 agree6 disagreeView comment

If all the games come on PC, there's almost no reason to...

3626d ago 9 agree10 disagreeView comment

If somewhere like Gamestop, Best Buy, or even Microsoft themselves offer an upgrade bonus if you have the original or S, sure why not.

3626d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Im judging based on comparison to the competition. If I was only judging based on the sales themselves, sure they'd be great, getting any game cheaper is a win. But compared to Steam, PSN, or even sometimes the occasional good Nintendo sale, Xbox Live sales are terrible unless something really special is going on, like the sale they had a month or so ago.

Like the E3 sale PSN had last week. A good amount of games were on sale, not like this week but an ok amount. All Xb...

3626d ago 4 agree7 disagreeView comment