Why are the player animations so janky looking? It need more animation work.
CBoat over on NeoGaf has been spot on from the PS4 and X1 rumored specs to the resolution issues on X1 at launch. Now gamers need to hope what he said about X1 having possible relability issues like 360 doesn't come true, that could be a death nail.
I want competition to keep Sony on their toes. I am starting with Ps4 and will eventually want an X1 for exclusives but Microsoft could be getting themselves in trouble early this gen and the hardware might not be strong eno...
lol, I was thinking they forgot to get their rocket scientists on the job. Sorry I had to say it.
Death the best analogy I can use is a water hose. The 32mb buffer was fine and maintained a steady stream flowing thru it on 360. The X1 has turned the water pressure up but has not increased the hose (32mb buffer) to allow the stream to flow properly and at an optimal rate. Thats the easiest way I can put it bro.
YEah but you have to remember this angers Xbox COD fans. Some gamers only play annual COD and 360 was the console of choice last gen for this group. Now this group has to rethink their gaming habits with the new consoles and then they find out the Xbox version is inferior. Will these gamers decide on a PS4 over X1 their choice is harder now.
Lets call a spade a spade and stop acting like the X1 architecture is so much different from the 360, cause it's not. Each have a small ERAM buffer. Problem is that MS failed to increase the size The EDRAM is 32mb in the 360 and the X1 has 32mb of ESRAM. IT was fine for 360 but its to small for X1 it should have at least been 42 mb and should have been 56mb. MS screwed up. Thank the now gone Don Mattrick for that one. It is what it is, its to small a frame buffer for true 1080p vis...
Wouldn't surprise me as it seems EA is given special treatment to MS.
It's inaccurate after a few thousand years. When people throw around millions of years they ignore evidence that does not fit their preconceived notions.
Also, lets not go into the fact the Earth is losing its magnetic field thru time which effects radiation. Oh and what was the Earth's atmospheres original carbon amount?
Yeah lets forget about carbon dating.
Not possible, its all marketing crap. Noone knows how old everything is, its just elitest jargon. Carbon dating is not accurate, know why because its manmade and we don't know what the hell we are doing. We like to take comfort in believing we know, lol, but we know jack squat.
Nothing to see here, move along. This isn't a review its opinion or preference based. If you review a console, you review a console, not mark off points because some games are delayed, thus having fewer games. A review should be objective and have longivity, so it applys the same as it did on launch and a year later. A potential consumer should be able to pull up and read what the console can do, they are not going to care what games it had on launch a year before. Where is processin...
Microsoft, microsoft, microsoft the repliers sound like company paid cheering section. I don't care its microsoft. My whole point is that $500 doesn't have to be spent to play this game and thus is not a system seller like it would be if it was only on X1.
not just online only but multiplayer only.
Honestly it doesn't bother me either way. What I would say is that it does run on the 15 year old Source engine, albeit modified, but in no way is or will Titanfall be a graphical showcase of a game. In fact it will look and play just fine on my 360 and anyone that has an itch can get a $100 360 to play it and not have to worry about shelling $500 smackers to scratch an itch.
No biggy really, if you are a PS4 only owner, Destiny comes out the month after Titanfall in April, that is where I will be spending my time. I have a 360 if I want to play it but honestly I haven't seen anything exciting about it. that is just me though and to each their own, but I diffently wouldn't spend $500 to play it on X1 when I already have a 360 that will run the game with the same gameplay as on X1.
If they really wanted to push X1 sales it should be excl...
Neither as they both suck, lol. Just between you and me lets let the low information person believe they have a choice between Obamacare and the ACA.
I can diffently see the added detail in textures and the resolution is clean whereas PS3 has a slight washed out look. Out of focus background has much better detail. The added effects for saw weather effects and no loading screens I can not judge as I didn't see that kind of footage.
Here's my question. Will X1 be the Obamacare equivalent in the gaming industry. Similarties are they are both the more expensive option and neither appeared ready before launch. What I am waiting to see is will X1 rollout be as disasterous as the ACA?
Doomz that is all well and good about getting some games early for review embargo, this is a system launch and some may get systems (probably big sites like IGN, Gamespot, etc.) others can either go to the review event or they can get a launch system install the day one patch and review the games. They have choices. It appears to me they are complaining that they have to go to this event because they weren't given free PS4's. What I say to those reviewers...you guys aren't spec...
Personally I think they should have dropped player count buy 4 or 8 and gone with 56 or 60 and raised to 1080p if possible. Player count does not equal better experience (mag had over 200), but resolution matters on my huge plasma tv.
The X1 is weaker hardware and should be sold as such. In no way should it cost $100 more than the stronger hardware it goes against free market principles. What MS needs to do is sell a non kinect SKU at $299 or $325, but that may not happen because MS wants to sell you that unnecessary Kinect at $100 profit.
With that way of thinking I hope Sony cleans MS clock and I was primarily a 360 player and used PS3 for exclusives, but I changed after seeing Sony's reveal and th...