Horizon is small. If you played it that should be evident. At least twice as small as Zelda if not more.
That isn't a bad thing though.
Horizons open world is basically like zeldas but without the shrines and korok seeds. And without always having an interesting landmark to explore in the distance. If their is an interesting landmark it's locked behind a quest.
It really doesn't. Maybe you just can't see all the hidden puzzles in the world 900 korok seeds and 120 shrines.
Also if your a Sony fan I hope you can say the same about horizon where the open world is nothing but empty space with enemies in it. Everything interesting is quest directed. No incentive to explore besides maybe the cauldrons which again are just revealed to you on your map and some even quest directed.
I love horizon but for differe...
Fable is not supposed to be "mature" whatever that means. It's goofy and wacky
Kill it
Hope another Sony studio can be successful as uncharted and hit 5 million. I think only naughty dog consistently gets that as far as I know.
Looking like gurilla games can at least hit 4 mill which I don't think they ever have
I've played most open world games and Zelda stands with the best of them
This isn't a bug it's abusing the physics in the game in an unintended way. But they also deseigned the game so that you could abuse physics to solve puzzles in unconventional ways
I've never got a 4/10 on an assignment before and If I did the assignment wasn't functional
man is it April 11th already or did you formulate that opinion from not playing the game somehow?
I don't think anyone was expecting this to be better than 90s platformers. I was expecting on par with modern graphics. Hell most games today can't stand up to banjo and Mario 64 so even in modern standards it's a feet to me.
No way is this game a 2. I would say 5 is reasonable for thinking a game is not great and meh. But a 2 means the game is absolutely no fun and completely broken.
Once it's out I'm still buying it though. Looks like a great platformer and at least appears to have more soul than most triple A games now a days.
Okay now no need for us to go fanboy.
It's getting quite a few of the majour indies ported
Xenoblade, Mario and fire emblem this year as well.
Nintendo doesn't need powerful hardware. As a gamer I assume you want to play fun games and Nintendo is still a master at this.
Fire emblem I just got into and it made me realize how wrong I was to never play a strategy game. Diversity is always great for the industry.
But it'll be portable
Why make a post of something you know nothing about. It's not empty, your not really supposed to focus on the side quests their sorta just their but the meat of the game is elsewhere. Theirs also no grinding as if you have the skill you can go straight to Gannon. People have beat the game in less than an hour.
@lord_sloth your a bit out of the loop. Metroid is no longer a thing and instead it's fire emblem and xenoblade. Also id highly disagree Nintendo is for casuals. Someone who doesn't include Zelda or fire emblem into their gaming time is a casual. Destiny, gta are both extremely casual and streamlined games. Actually most 3rd parties albeit a few have been sucking. Really it's indies, Sony and Nintendo that are keeping gaming alive and fun.
900 p docked and frame rate issue isn't a problem anymore
But to be far real mmos content like ESO and WOW is vastly superiority and much more content.
So their stuck with this mini mmo. Taken king was a proper dlc. The rest were meh.
You think horizons open world has density?
Honest question How?
Besides enemies littered throughout theirs nothing in the open world that is remarkable interesting. Side quests are but those are all in cities. Horizon definatley horizon open world is the one thing they can vastly improve on in the sequel.
Games like skyrim, Zelda, fallout, witcher. Have all these surprises hidden throughout the world. While horizon has nothing. Everythi...