Yea but than their are other babies relishing in this fact because of the salt that horizon scored lower. People on here that will never play Zelda and than downplay it over this review.
Seems like you want it to do worst?
You should play it, I can guarantee it would be your cup of tea if you tried it. Especially if you enjoyed open world games like horizon. Some of Jims problems with the game were actually positives for most people like the weapon system.
Also many reviews ignored skyrim, witcher 3 and others technical issues. Which are frankly worst than Zeldas were. This isn't some bias towards Zelda like you seem to think.
Not every Nintendo game gets a 97-98 metas...
I'd say most people on this site think of Zelda as a lesser title are fanboys. Now I don't think saying one game is better than the other is necessary. horizon and Zelda are both Id say objectively fun and well made games.
- Low level flying is actually in the game now lol.
- multiplayer aspects are in the game now
- they never promised "epic" factional space battles
I doubt you know what hard work is. They've done a lot of shit and it's only been half a year. Their a small team. I still think it could be better. But it's getting there.
The weapon system is fantastic.
Unlike other RPGs you have me using all sort of weapons instead of that one obvious invisible weapon choice.
It also gives a reason to even pick lower tier weapons and still find it useful which is great and really breaks away from RPGs staples.
How does it waste time? It takes literally no time to get another weapon.
The point is to not make it like all other RPGs where your using the best sword and never switch is to ensure diversity in play style. Which in term makes the game funner. It's also the strategy of when to use weak weapons and when to use strong weapons.
The system is not only not bad it enhances the game.
His review matters... even though he publicly hates Nintendo. I'm sure there was no bias in his review what so ever.
These are the things I'm seeing in the comments by Sony fanboys.
1
- Nintendo pays reviews
- well so couldn't Sony be doing that as well?
2.
- once the hype dies down it's just a "insert lower score"
- yet that same reasoning doesn't happen to horizon(or your fav game) because....?
3.
- Nintendo games are always rated high no matter what.
- metroid other M. ...
Maybe you think it's empty because your not seeing the puzzles that present itself within the world itself.
All the shrines make fast travel a breeze.
Plus all the Funkey stuff you see in the world. Such as the maze island, or those giant flying creatures that I don't want to spoil. All the puzzles. Sure horizon has great combat. But puzzles and making you feel smart plus great combat is what Zelda offers.
Now I think they are ...
So only Nintendo pays for reviews? But Sony would never pay for good reviews for horizon?
This is a stupid argument done by fanboys.
Stamina management by the way made the game fun. It was used very nicely with the world deseign. It's also upgradable to a point where you can probably climb 10* the distance you could at the start of the game.
Angry joe and boogie also clearly love the game. You'd be seeing 9s or higher from them...
Probably because these extra do nothing for the game. You want tradition link clothes than get the 8 bit amibo. It's an extra for nostalgia purposes of past games. Not required.
Says the guy who clearly hasn't played the game.
You do know horizon is rated teen. But that's not childish?
Not hating on either game. Both deserve 9/10 +
Someone hasn't played the game...
What a suprise a bunch of Sony fanboys still salty about zeldas score. It was a excellent game no matter how you down play it. Here is a dunkeys video, maybe after watching this you can see how fun it is.
https://youtu.be/9EvbqxBUG_...
And this is just mainly doing random combat shit not even the meat of the game.
Just a point they never promised player interaction. Only that you could visually see another player
Besides the fact you remember it's just a game and not a big deal right? You did forget to include that in your post?
They only promised to be able to see people. So imagine dark soul ghost things, no interaction but you can see them.
Honestly they need more combat stuff to do. These updates have made economy and exploration better. Need something for now these new class of weapons
They don't need to rerelease? All the content is within free updates
The price is low right now
It breaks a lot of Zelda conventions I'd say.