I literally could not care less why one girl on the internet doesn't like JRPGs.
What's the point of spending this kind of money on TV spots over a year before the game is even going to come out? Just to possibly boost pre-orders that people then have a whole year to rethink? Seems like a terrible investment to me. No other game has ever done TV spots this early, and there have been thousands of massively well selling games, so "building a presence" doesn't make any sense either.
Yeah, I've seen other TV spots too. It makes no sense at all. No one who didn't already know the game was revealed is gonna see a commercial and say "damn, I gotta mark down fall of next year!".
You only need two reasons, because it's a major release and Nintendo needs strong third party titles. This isn't some huge mystery. God this article is stupid.
More CheatCC clickbait garbage.
*stands up and claps*
This is why it's pointless to ever try to appeal to the Diversity Is Everything/SJW crowd. They will *never* be happy, because all they do is look for shit to complain about. Just...make games. Don't try to appeal to the loudest whiners. I guarantee you almost no one who actually plays Battlefield every time a new game is released gives a crap what skin color or gender the characters are. The only people who care are games "journalists" and people looking for something to be...
I agree totally about short games not automatically being bad, but the thing is with VR you're not just paying 20 dollars for a 5 hour game. You're paying 400+ dollars for a VR headset, camera, and move controllers to be able to buy 5 hour games that may or may not make you sick. As it is right now, VR needs to do more to be worth the price of admission, on PC and console both.
Most games are still in the tech demo phase, where there's really no point to them other than to show off that PSVR works--with mixed results, considering all the motion sickness reports on certain games. VR on PCs hasn't even shown that it's a worthwhile investment yet. PSVR has a long way to go before it's anything more than just another peripheral fad that will die out in a few years.
Every so often the game just stops to smugly remind you about the heat death of the universe.
No, we need more well written female (and male) characters. "Strong" characters run the risk of being boring Mary Sue's.
I can't wait. I've wanted to play this since it was announced. Easily my most anticipated game this year.
Like anyone didn't know this was gonna be an easy target for this stuff. Grow some balls, block people, and move on. If you think your message is important then focus on that and not a bunch of chat trolls. Of course, if the whole point of this "diversity" panel was to attract the trolls so they could paint themselves out to be victims and get sympathy points, then they're doing exactly what they should be doing. Either way, professional gaming and streaming is already prett...
You guys gave it a 5/10 so...
This article itself is kind of clickbaity, because the bit about what Spencer said is barely three sentences quoted from a different article, and the rest is what the person who wrote *this* article thinks about reviews. I mean, I mostly agree with the guy, but it's kind of funny.
Not at all happy to hear the word "cliffhanger" being used to describe the ending...
Well, of course. Because the game is an unvarnished, gritty, no-holds-barred look at the sixties, except where that might annoy SJWs. Which means plenty of white racists but no hookers. You know, just like the real sixties.
So, it's another pointless tech demo disguised as a game. Typical VR fare.
Lots of games prove free to play doesn't have to suck, though...
Will it make coffee? Will it solve complex math problems? Will it mate with my dusty Wii U? Will it watch me while I masturbate? These are just a few of the many things that Nintendo has yet to comment on, but none of these are mentioned in this fine, utterly necessary, and insightful article. You might want to write up another one.