"Guerrilla could well be saving up to 18MB of precious GDDR3 video RAM"
This quote shows just how severely limited developers are when it comes to video RAM on these systems.
In times where even entry-level GPUs have 1 GB of VRAM you'd think 18MB isn't enough to deserve a mention.
No thanks, I don't want to buy a console.
An emulator will eventually become available, I'll just wait and play other games in the meantime rather than clutter up my place with gadgets I have barely any use for.
If there were a dozen exclusives I want then I might even buy a console. But there are only three, maybe four exclusive games I'm interested in. Not worth it.
PS3 gamers and their exclusives, always reminds me of "my preeeeeciousssss....."
I hate exclusives. I want to play some of them, but they don't make me buy a platform. So I end up not playing (and buying) them.
It worked for the Wii. Dust magnet or not.
Pretty much.
They can't do anything about websites quoting "secret sources". But when the website makes it sound as if someone from Sony had made these statements they intervene.
Wait, Nina Dobrev was on the show playing Kinect?
*offtofindhighdefinitionversi onofthis*
PS3 it only does Mass Effect **2**. See what I did there?
Nobody is "pushing" any hardware these days. We'll have to wait for the next console cycle because this one's been at its limit for a while.
Yeah you disagree, because it doesn't make any sense.
And yet people agree that Kinect is "essentially a webcam" which makes just as little sense.
Double standards as usual.
If Kinect is essentially a webcam (webcam + motion tracking),
then Move is essentially a dildo (dildo + motion tracking).
Oh, people are definitely saying it's an eyetoy.
I won't look up any comments now, but I've read this statement at least a dozen times in the last two weeks.
Why do you think the mainstream media reviews Kinect? Because this system is marketed towards non-gamers or "regular" people.
Microsoft cares way less about reviews from the gaming media. Where do you think a non-gamer reads about Kinect? In the New York Times or on Gamespot?
You folks keep saying that Kinect is not for the hardcore. And that's true. That's what the reviews reflect.
The choice of games is too limited? My choice of PC games reaches back more than 20 years.
The available catalog of games by far exceeds anything your PS360 has to offer.
HardOCP are out of their mind. Their tiny screenshots are useless, and the conclusions they draw could not be more flawed.
MLAA takes an educated guess at which edges need to be anti-aliased and then smooths them without any available sub-pixel data.
Post processing an existing frame always causes a loss of detail, there are no two ways about it.
Sure, the edges may lack aliasing, comparable to 8x MSAA. But high frequency texture detail gets ...
I didn't say that anything looks better on consoles (even though God of War 3 clearly does).
I just said that the textures in Killzone 2 are very lowres and that they seem to have been improved a bit in Killzone 3.
Yup, that's what I'm waiting for. I don't have an Xbox, but I definitely want this technology on the PC.
MLAA is a sub-standard filtering technique.
The only reason why it exists is because it's inexpensive to calculate.
I count exactly two, amidst mostly 8's, with an average of 7.9
http://n4g.com/channel/kine...
Really? Show me one full resolution (720p) in-game shot from Killzone 2 with tack-sharp textures.
8/10 is a solid rating, but not a perfect one. So it only makes sense that reviews list a few cons among the pros. If the review only mentioned the pros, then the 8/10 would have to be a 10/10.
However, Bereaver and his brethren then go ahead, only quote the negative things and ignore the overall verdict + rating. That's what true fanboyism is all about.