What you said makes no sense. If you have a good GPU as you say, then you should be able to run Call of Duty without issue.
Note how Modern Warfare 2 pulls 59 fps on a *single core* at 1920x1200 (= 3.75 times as many pixels as on the console versions).
http://www.tomshardware.com...
LA is a small place with a mere 14 million people.
There was only one midnight launch in town, no doubt.
What are you talking about? Who said Kinect is supposed to replace sports? I certainly didn't.
Apart from the obvious difference in contrast, the PS3 seems to use lower resolution shadow maps.
Looking at the 6th image (in the bar), the drop shadows are very blurry and undefined where they are much crisper in the 360 version (underneath the arm or the shadow on the man's shirt)
Other than that they look comparable. I do think that the contrast is too high on the 360 (the blacks are crushed).
"I mean... come on folks.. microsoft will never be #1 like sony was... They measure their success in months..."
Microsoft net income 2010 = $18.760 billion
Sony net income 2010 = −$437 million
"...why?..because they look retarded."
No, because they don't want to move their fat ass away from the couch with the potato chips.
An interactive comic is a good idea, but it can hardly replace the experience of the first game. Making decisions in a short comic about characters and story elements you hardly know is pretty hit or miss.
Can you grow as attached to Wrex in a comic as you can during hours of actual gameplay? Will it even matter to you what happens to him?
I definitely recommend actually playing the first game before moving on to Mass Effect 2. To me Mass Effect 1 is a 10/10 ...
Wow, Sherlock. Really?
A company releases a product in order to make money? Now that's unheard of right there.
"Microsoft seems oblivious to the space available to Europeans and Asians in their homes."
This article must be written by a clueless writer who desperately needed to come up with 10 things to hate about Kinect.
Homes in the major European markets certainly don't lack the space for Kinect any more than North American homes.
Probably around $500 for the 580.
"don't the latest games need newer graphics cards"
No, they don't. If you have an 8800 from four years ago, you shouldn't have any trouble running new games.
Here's a hint: Microsoft cares way less about a review on IGN than it cares about a review in a big newspaper. Because most of the target audience does not read IGN.
Edit: This reply was supposed to be in answer to MaxOpower who completely missed the mark with his snarky statement.
A PC that runs multiplatform titles now will still run the multiplatform titles that come out in 3 years. Why wouldn't it? They are all coded for the same static console hardware.
Just look at the system requirements. They have barely changed over the last 4 years. even though processing power has *quadrupled* according to Moore's Law.
A mix of Medium and High settings may be right, but texture quality must be the equivalent of Low based on what I've seen.
To increase sales of their hardware? Haha, like I'm going to buy a console for a handful of decent exclusive games.
"How is Sony supposed to lose GT5 exclusivity ct03?"
That was not my point. Anton suggested bringing GT5 to the PC. Even if it's just hypothetical, it would allow more players to enjoy the game (not just PS3 gamers).
40 people disagreed with Anton, apparently not wanting non-PS3 gamers to be able to enjoy the game.
Whenever I say that I hate exclusives and would like everything to be multi-platform, I also get dozens of disagree...
Of course everybody on here will disagree with you. They don't want to lose their precious exclusive.
But if the chosen platform isn't powerful enough then this really begs the question why there is not a version for the platform that *is* powerful enough, i.e. PC.
I only view it as a victory of technology. I'm interested in future implementations of this for the PC.
Multiplayer in Dead Space is completely pointless. I won't touch it.
Don't click this link, it may bother you.
http://img155.imageshack.us...