CRank: 5Score: 47210

It’s PS3

471d ago 12 agree2 disagreeView comment

It is because the second half is really bad in The Room. The first part is great.

473d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

They patented the system, sadly. What that means legally I am not sure. But people don’t want to test the water.

476d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

@TriniOutsider

You are right that FF was largely a Nintendo based property for years. But the shift of FFVII from N64 to PS1 changed the brand to the degree the major titles have not come to Nintendo machines except as remasters since. The last entries focussed on PS systems.at expense of Xbox . They have suggested they will make them multi format in future. Which is a loss for PS from a marketing perspective. So the association is legitimate. Although I see your point.

478d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Hence why Elden Ring was one of the worst selling games of all time…

482d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

People defending Sony here don’t understand that they had a customer when the hardware was announced who did not trust Sony to support by time it was released. Having a tech demo as the flagship game felt deeply disappointing. I loved PSVR but there was not enough software to justify the price for vr2.

Sony abandon it, so does everyone else.

And yes people also want “flat” games for their hardware. Also a problem this gen.

484d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

Maybe they think this group gets too much crap by people overreacting online. Maybe they are making a point of including them.

You are correct may come at the expense of other options. I am fine with the imaginary scars and fine with people making imaginary breasts in games. If people are arguing over this, there really is not enough going on in gaming.

484d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

It’s called denial, making a logical argument for an illogical reaction.

484d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

He is a troll. Designed to stoke people up on here. We know this.

It’s quite funny.

487d ago 25 agree5 disagreeView comment

But did Sony really spend this money? It started 8 years ago? Buying bungee was weird. Because the way you use them is to make them build a good multiplayer FPS but with a campaign like Halo.

It’s like when Microsoft bought rare. And you got Viva Piñata, grabbed by the ghoulies and Nuts ‘n’ Bolts.

487d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

6 is not an awful mark in edge. They use the whole scale.

497d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

This is the worst generation in terms of first party games so far. Both consoles. So few new IPs and so few games at all. spider-man, god of war and Horizon sequels felt so close to the last generation in terms of play experience, despite their quality.

Sony gave up on PSVR2 after one year, I held back on buying because they had one game and no games for the future. They looked at that and said nobody’s buying it. If they released three games in the first the market would g...

503d ago 6 agree2 disagreeView comment

What are the correct squeals to make?

508d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

The hideous art style in the sims has always been a barrier

515d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Clap hanz made the later Everybody’s Golf. I love those games but the studio was not owned by Sony ever. They are open to working with them. I am sad because I want a VR golf sequel, but the studio is fine.

Team Ico made Shadow of Colossus.

Sony Japan made Gravity Rush. Siren.

516d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Imagine if they published some games for it too again.

539d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Sony made one new major game for it basically and did not incentivise support from third parties effectively. I held off from buying because Sony did not show a future or even support backwards compatibility on their previous games like Astrobot or Blood and Truth.

542d ago 11 agree4 disagreeView comment

Driveclub was genuinely a good game with a poor launch. Alpha Protocol is superb, just a few archaic design choices for the time.

545d ago 11 agree0 disagreeView comment

By free to play standards I find this company makes good games (although often with inconsistent writing), sadly they would simply be better if you remove any the elements that support the f2p model.

I don’t like exclusivity in this sense. It is infuriating. I don’t have an Xbox but just invest this money in game development

556d ago 3 agree4 disagreeView comment

I think they’ve done a good job. All the models have lost the stylised look of the PS2 game, which was cool but would look bizarre in a more detailed environment with decent facial animation. The model looks appropriate for the back story and age, you can see they considered that in the redesign. The jawline is large on both if that is the complaint.

571d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment