CRank: 5Score: 47210

They are making a point. A game that sets out to take your money at the expense of entertaining you merits rejection.

2075d ago 6 agree1 disagreeView comment

It’s paying to be robbed. If you want to bump that up to a one, knock yourself out.

2075d ago 9 agree0 disagreeView comment

Having it on PC or supporting mouse and keyboard controls on PS4/5 would really up the quality of creation. The controls are fine but inevitably there are some sacrifices with precision with analogue sticks and Move. The best other addition would be VR sculpting.

2081d ago 1 agree4 disagreeView comment

The absence of transparency and deeper logic management really hamstrings what is otherwise an excellent tool.

2081d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I have been a PS4 and Switch owner this generation. But this is clearly marketing bluster. The Series X likely has the edge in hardware quality. We are going to see two very similar machines. It will be down to first party exclusives where my money goes.

2081d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Generally the game looks much better but I think some of the facial designs are weaker and less distinct. There are certainly ones that benefit from the update too. Obviously I am getting this.

2086d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Oh. That was pretty awful.

2090d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

The very reason why it is more sensible to remake Code Veronica.

2090d ago 9 agree1 disagreeView comment

Unless you mean the 2008 one.

2090d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Sands of Time has a 92% metacritic. You must have ducked out of a lot of sites that year.

2090d ago 8 agree0 disagreeView comment

Weirdly the NES version is superior by some margin in my opinion. It is far more responsive and fair than the graphically superior coin-op.

2091d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Where does it say they are a DJ? Where does it say it’s a mobile game?

2112d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

There was a rumour they lost the source code. I am sure there is a way around this, especially if there are notes. But I don’t know enough about the technicalities.

2130d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

“ used in reference to the phenomenon whereby a computer-generated figure or humanoid robot bearing a near-identical resemblance to a human being arouses a sense of unease or revulsion in the person viewing it“.

In graphical terms it is going to be an almost imperceptible difference with w person that will somehow feel off, or unsettling.

2137d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yes. That’s right. Opinion pieces regarding gaming are fine. Where as potentially misleading or unverified news about a potential pandemic is not. What’s the issue?

2146d ago 4 agree8 disagreeView comment

Find that and check through the creator’s history you may find the other versions.

2147d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The Rest of Us. They brought it to a more playable stage, with almost a whole level. Then seemed restart, so likely a problem with logic.

2147d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

If you have used the tools in the game you’d understand the scale of achievement it takes to create something like this.

2152d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

Nobody has any idea what you’re going on about. Have another go. Explain the context of your comment.

2157d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Crash has been shared as a character I believe.

2166d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment