I'll be honest with you, that smells like pure gasoline.
Yeah, it would be great to know how many people have subscribed to plus, because I'm a sheep and can't make my own decisions!
Well the Emotional part means there will be boobs.
The survival part means clothes will be torn.
Sounding good so far!
"... filling the void between light and heavy that makes it suitable for those looking to race properly, but not so excessive that a single, slight collision should destroy the chance to win."
Are these gamers, or bitches? Because they seem to be doing more of the latter than the former!
There is no way you can like Temple of Doom over Crusade.
"We called the dog Indiana!"
Maybe Spielberg's wife put me off Temple of Doom.
I really wish TR was better at what it does. Though Uncharted is strictly linear, I still felt I was the first person to discover temples in centuries... In TR I felt somebody had created a room full of puzzles.
Maybe it's down to presentation and controls, but Lara croft just isn't fun any more, and hasn't been for a while.
She's like SpiderMan - one good game (Spiderman 2), and each successive one just regurgitates the tired controls, locals...
1) Talk to Naughty Dog
2) License their engine
3) Replace all instances of Nate, with Lara
4) ????
5) Profit
Square Enix and Eidos (RIP) should be ashamed they have yet to make a Indiana Jones rip-off, when Naughty Dog made something better than two of the movies (Temple of Doom, Crystal Skull) on the first try.
STOP THE BASTARD PRESSES!
"but based on past experiences whatever a player does in-game is usually reflected in their co-op partner’s adjacent screen."
I'm not sure these folk have ever played CO-OP, because I've never played a game where a character's supposed stance (because we can't see anything more than through their eyes) matches what my partner will see.
Wow, objective journalism over here.
Mother fucking religious folk gotta spoil everything.
If anything it is an atheist's game - there is no god to help you, you are on your own. Any hallucinations resulting are down to the player.
Could have fooled me!
I've sunk many hours into GT over the years, and it's spot on. It's not a game, it's a sim. Much like the difference between StarFox and Elite, you'll have fans who like one and hate the other.
It's a great experience, but be prepared not to enjoy it, and if you want to enjoy it, be prepared to put in a lot of work.
Since they only review PS3 games on a 1-7 (note Edge do not say out of what they score) scale, this is impressive!
But was Addiction in Fallout 3 so bad?
"You are now addicted to Jet"
*Shrugs, carries on*
There weren't any any harsh side-effects, the lowing of stats maybe but they hardly had an effect, especially at higher levels.
Yes, a flop is where the company making it spent more money on it, that they made.
It's a little early for GT5, but I'm sure it's on its way to recuperating its money.
Article should be "Top 10 Next Gen Games that didn't meet my expectations"
Metroidvanias don't need vehicles.
The reason Batman AA was so awesome is that it wasn't made to be a Batman game - you could replace all the characters and it would still be a great game.
Make a good game first, then make it a Batman game!
Why does nobody speak english anymore?!
I just paid £145 for a TV license I don't use except for the occasional show on iplayer, WHY THE FUCK are Top Gear and other BBC shows not on there for free, as we have already paid for them.
Fuck Aunty Beeb. Fuck her in the ear.
Hollywood takes over. They're just making The Last Crusade, again.
Also, Wallberg? The in-game model used in Uncharted can act better than Wallberg!
Get Flanigan on the cast, genetically he looks like he was made to play Drake.
Once a dev starts waxing lyrical about is favourite games, you know it'll have a hard time living up to expectations.