Yeah i know its in-engine, but this article talks about things like space battles even though that isn't really confirmed.
Aren't these just screen grabs of the fmv trailer? These are clearly not actual gameplay.
Force Unleashed WAS canon. But as Temprix pointed out all of the Star Wars canon was reset when Disney bought Star Wars and decided tonmake episode 7. They had to reset it all because there were so many novels and extra content that took place after Return of the Jedi that they wouldn't be able to male the movie they wanted, and they were afraid to contradict anything that already existed.
They kept almost everything pre-A New Hope though because that would have had lit...
It means its an official part of the Star Wars timeline and stories.
@ Moldybread
I'm not upset about anything. If you read my previous posts you'll see that. I was simply pointing out the absurdity of blaming another company for microsoft's decision.
I put over 500 hours into the first one. I understand its flaws, but where it really shined was in the gameplay, which is the most important thing to me. Sure there was a lot of grinding, but it was fun as hell. Me and buddies played more co-op on that game than any other game in the 17 or 18 years i've known them.
We're all over Destiny 2.
I though almost all of these games were already announced when they revealed the Switch....
No, but you can play a big chunk of it in 2 hours.
Yes. Blame Steam for a decision that Microsoft made on their own.
Thats ridiculous. I should probably go rob some banks then, because other people set the precedent that its a way to get more money. And hey! I won't be blamed for it either! Because it wasn't my original idea! I just copied someone else. I can just point my finger at other bank robbers before me and say, "Don't blame me! They did it first!"
Thats an interesting view y...
Yeah, they are both flawed, actually.
2 hours isn't fair for a lot of reasons, but as you pointed out, percentages are also flawed based on the type of game.
So I'm not sure where the answer lies.
What about No Man's Sky? It took a LOT of people more than 2 hours just to leave their first planet. That being the case, there's no way to tell, at that point, that the game was missing a bunch of features that the devs said would be in the game at launch.
No time limit is fair. Not to place it on all games across the board. All games are different. You can't blanket it like that. The only fair way is to do a percentage. But even that has its flaws. Like in spo...
Its tough because every game is different.
2 hours is not enough time to realize you want a refund in all cases. No Man's Sky proved that. It took more time than that for most people to realize that the game doesn't have everything they originally advertised.
Also, like they are arguing here, some games are short and you can play through half the game in under 2 hours and then ask for a refund.
No time limit is fair in all cases...
Which is strange because combat has ALWAYS been a huge part of the Mass Effect series.
I'm always a little confused when people say this. Nothing against you at all. It just seems strange that a game that is this heavy in combat is not one of the big factors that attract people. I understand the story, character interacions, and RPG elements thing. But people act like combat was never an important part of ME, which is just wrong. Nearly every singe mission involves com...
Its true. All of it. The Jedi. The Force. Chewie.....we're home.
Dong damage would have made this game way better.
Its gameplay had no depth. What you are referring to is content.
Depth, meaning, all the weapons felt the same. None had any recoil and they all felt very lackluster.
Depth, meaning the missions were all very simplistic. Aside from Walker Assault, no other modes were really worth playing.
Depth, meaning the flight controls were so boring and elementary that it wasn't even fun to be in a Tie Fighter or X-Wing. Flying was also pretty...
@ Kowan
Lol. Thats like saying all the extra DLC costumes in Batman Arkham City weren't Arkham City costumes because they were from different comic books and not designed for Arkham City.
Are they in the game? Can they be used in the game? Then guess what. They are for the game. It doesn't matter that they are retro, or throwbacks from a previous game. They can be bought and used in this game, so they are clearly FOR this game.
That picture is ridiculous and could literally be anyone. I'm not real sure how they jumped to the Wolverine conclusion from that picture. It doesn't even show most of his arms. It just looks like someone bending over.
Having said that, if this game isn't based on the movie universe then I would fully expect Wolverine in it. Aside from being dead in the comics for the past couple years he was an Avenger for quite a while as well as an X-Man.
N...
Yes....realistic scenarios in RE1 like that gigantic Snake and Shark you had to fight.
I love how hurt your BH is over RE7. It makes me laugh every time you comment on it.
I'm not sure BF1 is worth $10