I see a bright future ahead for games and gamers. Where the gamer gets treated with respect and the content purchased from the developer/publisher justifies the cost.
Lol, sorry, I sometimes write things out to see if they are believable.
Disappointing but in no way surprising. I don't recall them every saying it was a definite 2016 release anyways.
These sound like logical changes.
I have no opinion on most of them but I do think the voice that chastises is a tad annoying. I'm aware of when I do good and when I do poorly, but when that voice just jabs it in, I'm left feeling annoyed rather than raring to go for another round. As for the winning teams gestures and voice prompts, I'm not as bothered by it, since I'm too busy looking at their armour and admiring the taunts and such that they've acquire...
Hehe, so happy I own this.
I wouldn't pay $60 for what's been shown and marketed so far. The game looks great, but what and how much there is to do in a game, along with longevity, is what I base my value on. Prime example, the new Ratchet and Clank game, looks amazing and will no doubt play amazingly, but it's not even being priced at $60.
So hopefully the price is a max $40, otherwise I'll be waiting for a price cut, or, won't pick it up for a very, very long time.
10,000 calories and VR? What's not to love.
Look at this guy. Super important. Reminds me of Facebook.
"If you're still here, it means you're a true friend!"
I'm not sure why people are disagreeing with you.
Maybe you should adapt in those situations.
:D
Variety is key. Sometimes taking a risk can pay off and win gamers over, other times it can backfire. The same can be said for taking no risks and sticking to the same pattern. It will appeal to the core fanbase but over time people will trickle away from the lack of change.
I'd like to see destruction actually come back. None of this Levolution nonsense (well not just Levolution on its own). If I shoot a wall, I'd like for there to be bullets. I know, crazy, but not ...
The 3DS is indeed awesome. But as Ninja stated, the possibility that NX will play Wii U games, almost rules out completely the reason to obtain a Wii U. I love Nintendo, but I can't justify picking up a Wii U, not until I know what exactly the NX has to offer.
I've truthfully held off completely on the idea of the Wii U, because if the NX releases as a better console, with a Zelda game no less, then It's an instant purchase (Zelda has that power over me).
But, still need to know exactly what the NX is.
Yes Anubis, continue to feed your mind negativity. Let it consume your fragile identity.
Graphically doesn't look like much of a leap forward. Though I play Tales for the story/characters. *Shrug* It'll be in my collection regardless.
Change again? I kind of feel it only recently started to get relevant.
That was a splendid trailer.
Cumulative.
:)
I already own Galek-Z, since it's incredibly difficult, however I didn't vote for the winner so naturally it doesn't necessarily appeal to me.
Do I think ps+ is lacking in value? I'd say it's certainly up for debate. However I wouldn't go as far as to say the service is horrendous.
Truthfully however, I dislike paying for the service. Never was convinced by its need to be a mandatory (ok, almost mandatory) thing.
Pitchforks ready!
Stand in line!
We're going to war boys! Justice will prevail!
--
On a serious note. I assume this will be handled. For now it serves as an interesting little source of marketing.
"They stole art? The title makes sense now!" <- as such.
And read this guys witty remark, from the witty remark of another person, commenting on the witty remark from an article/news/opinion piece.