Heh. Do we have a different definition of must-have?
Please tell what I am missing by not playing NBA 2K21 Casino Edition, Watch Dogs Bored, More-Of-The-Same Kombat 11, Civilization Downhill VI, TDP: 'Little Hope', and Immortals Fenyx Rising (that we don't even know whether it's good since it hasn't released yet...).
They all could be good, yeah, but must-have? That's a term for great gaming experiences like The Witcher 3, Marvel's Spid...
6 of those games aren't must-have in any way, shape or form.
They should have stayed away from GaaS.
"Creators of the most insanely mediocre shooters on the planet"*
The two guys sleeping outside the store got two each.
And they got their PS5s. I guess it was worth it.
Great? It's anything but great.
The Witcher 3 proved that you don't need DRM to sell tons of copies and piracy doesn't take anything from sales. People who purchase games will always purchase games, people who pull a Jack Sparrow will sail the seas forever. DRM only hurts paying customers with low and mid-range PCs.
The Evil Within 2 didn't sell because of Bethesda. They barely marketed the game at all. Oh, here's an E3 trailer, expect the game to release in 4 months, and that's it. Most people don't know of its existence, and those who do were burned out of the first one.
Not to sound like an elitist or anything, but I don't like using controllers one bit. K&M all day, every day.
Yeah, if this keeps going, Game Pass looks more and more attractive. I also realised recently that I never replayed games in the last couple of years due to limited time and many good games, so replayability doesn't matter to me. I never thought I'd say this as I was opposed to subscriptions, but If I can get to experience a $70 game day 1 for $10 instead of waiting months for a sale, Game Pass is a no-brainer for me.
Well, that's interesting. 71% of Spider-Man: Miles Morales' sales are on PS5 even when the PS5 hasn't released yet in the U.K. Seems the majority want to play the new games on the new consoles.
Sigh. Does it really matter?
They have comparable performance you can't go wrong with either. PS5 and Xbox Series X, AMD and Intel, AMD and Nvidia, they all trade blows, so just buy whichever you like the most. It's a great time to be a gamer.
Okay, I am with you that there's bias on the site but I am wondering how could this happen to PS5? Where would the confusion come from?
Xbox One X doesn't cost $500 now.
PC Gamer gave it 92.
Activision has confirmed the sizes on all platfotms:
- PS4: 95GB
- PS5: 133GB
- Xbox One: 93GB
- Xbox Series X|S: 136GB
- PC 125GB (Full Game on Ultra Graphics), 82GB (Full Game), 35GB (Multiplayer Only)
Can't wait for $70 games that include microtransactions.
Yeah, good luck getting one for that 'great price.'