I'm not sure if you view EA in a positive light, but you seem to have a strong belief that people here are citing reasons they probably won't like to play the game as faux issues that only they seem to believe- there's no realism to be had in Dragon Age, but based on the way the designers and writers of Inquisition shoehorned every "diverse" and horribly written, poorly motivated characters into the game- i already know not to take EA/Bioware at their word when it comes ...
What developers currently give that 30% for is exposure to the platform as a whole, the traffic of steam is unmatched by any Storefront on the PC platform and it uses that fact to drive a hard bargain as it were, of course- the larger cut to the devs is important but at the cost of an unknown storefront with policies no one is really sure of just yet, driven *purely* by the success of Fortnite and as such Epic Games have themselves a story that begins almost identically to Valve's own wit...
The problem is more if you compare good co-op experiences to this one the only similarity is that they both have co-op, beyond that the game is just like fallout 4 (but with more bugs somehow) i'm a fan of Fallout and Bethesda but my god, it's like developers these days look past what the fans want (i.e. an improved version of their favourite game with co-op and possibly pvp elements added) and just go an entirely different direction such as removing all npc's, monetize EVERYTHING...
one of my biggest issues is how the auto aim carries over from single player, takes no skill at all to spam L2 until you have a lock just to move up for a headshot, there should be tougher game modes that force free aim.
At this point it honestly seems like a game where you get glorified for killing men and for killing women you get your save file deleted would be seen as positive by the kind of people that write these articles- as Rainslacker mentions; it doesn't promote the violence against a specific group other than those in our modern sphere of influence as being racist- a very common reality of the period, so there's no controversy on which for these articles to exist yet they do.
Apparently the newest tomb raider was getting flack for "murder porn" when Lara dies, so apparently it doesn't matter which way the bread is buttered, it's always wrong from these people.
I'm not sure if everyone always bringing up Metal Gear Survive's MT has even played it, but the MT are for a very few select things and 10 minutes in you forget about them entirely because they're not pushed on you, nor are they even very useful honestly.
If you want extra revives/chances in the mp component then sure, but the game is clearly focused on SP which is drastically different to what many expected i believe, you can't buy an advantage there.
As long as Microsoft remain committed to releasing their games on PC i'm all for it.
Any idea on Obsidian's next game? new IP with new money? I'm hoping for something Alpha Protocol flavoured.
i'm fairly sure you can check the Log via the left d-pad to see what missions (side missions too) you can do- there's also access to the challenges there too.
The physics can be strange but the system works too well for me to be mad at something like that, kinda like how you tumble down a large incline only to smack your head off a rock at the bottom ahah- but yeah weird physics happen here and there.
At this point in time it'll take a very different and new project to truly give them a basis for creating a new engine for their games- and as it's likely the next big thing; why not Starfield?.
In other news water is wet.
If you're wanting something like that i'd recommend checking out a game called GTFO, a few outlets have described it as hardcore L4D and it seems pretty interesting to say the least.
Have you tried going to the "Anderson Camp" on the map? if you can't find players you should still be able to start and find matches, previously talking to Anderson in the camp would allow you to play and progress in these new missions.
It's a shame you haven't found many people to play with but honestly this game is best served with friends or people you regularly play games with- much like Payday 2 was.
that's not true at all? i've been playing the game throughout each beta and the very first beta allowed you to play the first expedition called "Hell or High Water"
Furthermore, they gave access to all the missions after the first beta as some people complained about the lack of guidance, they're adding and changing plenty of things even now as they fix various issues and tighten mechanics, it's not gonna blow anyone away but it's not as bad as...
Why does every video people put up on this game so far only highlight the worst part of the game? not the large stealth based levels with real gameplay, tension and design?. poor decision from Overkill to put these in the game honestly, i feel like there are better ways to exercise your gun toting itch without doing this.
As soon as gamers understand different studios work on games maybe they'll forgive the Bioware studio that didn't even work on Andromeda..
I would absolutely buy that they'd want to move a game's release date, if only because new IP is risky and releasing it against smaller titles is the best way to ensure gamers give it a fair chance over their other options, as Anthem is a mp game it's gonna garner more online presence just for that alone i reckon.
<...
Absolutely right on that- while ToR does do a bad job of F2P it does a very good one of sub play; it's the only MMO i can think of that really doubles down on story.
@D3athc3ll
Why is someone always mentioning the "$2000 pc" they don't cost that much unless you've got money to burn, and yes, every multiplat (can) look better because they use native resolutions higher than 1080p.
Look, you can shit out a paragraph and a half about exclusives, at this point most people will have a PS4 and a PC; why any developer would only use one platform if they can help it is beyond me. exclusives are exactly that b...
What does multiplat have to do with "diluting" the game? people can't help but push their biases, it's not the exclusivity that's selling those games- it's the pure quality talent on show from the devs every step of the way.
One thing i'd really like to see is a revised version that has a better build quality, some faster hardware and a screen upgrade, or at least a larger battery life maybe? i like the idea that it wants to be able to dock and be handheld, but by trying to do both it seems to not really cater to either as well as it could.
Perhaps the best way to solve that is by producing a dock that does improve the performance and power of it?.
I will say most of all i do think...