you are taking me too literally.My point is, and i suspect you know this already, was to point out how fast technology changes. There is no possible way the PS3 or the 360 will be able to compete with mobile phones in seven years,let alone a new games console(don't take me literally again).Why some of you guys find it hard to except these things is well beyond me.I'm sure the PS3 and the 360 will be selling games in four years,but the supposed 'power' will simply be outdated as it already is,...
guys,consider this. Today it was announced that Diamond have released a 2GB graphics card. Now, that's today's technology people, in the year 2007.Does anyone really think that the 512MB memory architecture, however you care to split it up, will be sufficient for any console for the next four years, let alone five, six or seven? I'm serious guy's take a reality pill!
Why would an advertiser want to place an advert in to a game in an inconspicuous or realistic way? The point of advertising is to get the product noticed, not blend in unnoticed! And what happens when the advertising revenue from the game is actually worth more than the game revenue? Is it possible software quality maybe sacrificed? Oh, and wouldn't it be nice if you had to watch an onscreen commercial before you get access to that unlockable! The possibilities are endless and very likely jud...
Yes Of course we will see the best of PS3 in years to come, but that applies equally to the 360 or the Wii for that matter.It's not that he said this, but WHY he said it! Anyone care so answer that?
Boy! It must be nice to live off constant re-hashes of the same game.Once it was a good game, now its just ancient history, if you'll excuse the pun.
You WILL live to regret it.
throughout this gen.There will be no clear winner. Get used to it fanboys.Next gen? There will be no clear winner, unless either Sony or MS drop the ball.Having just the two main rivals is good for gamers, isn't it?
The ONLY thing that is clear about this gen machines is,THERE'S NO CLEAR WINNER! No, wait i tell a lie.The only other thing we no for sure is,all fanboys on either side saying their console is the winner in this gen are actually,the real LOSERS!
I said at the time everyone was whooping over KZ2 'in game' trailer, that it was not only possible, but likely, that the devs would have to come down a little from their lofty expectations and believe me it will.However, there is no reason to argue on this particular point. If the devs say they wouldn't be able to get this running on 360 without shortcuts, then ok.It is true,whichever console you choose to support, that the 360 lacks a HDD as STANDARD across the range. This was inevitably goi...
I don't see why Haze couldn't come to 360.Afterall isn't Halo 3 the last in the series? Sure, if it was in direct competition with Halo 3, then yeah, forget it, but it wouldn't be.Still,if Ubisoft wish to turn down a good pay day, then thats their loss.
Lets leave it at that and get NEWS we all want to read! Unless of course, reading reviews of crap games is somehow important to you.
but these scores are, or at least should be, seen as relative to the current console technology and games available at this point in time.And at this point in time, HALO 3 is the pinnacle, the dogs bo110ck5, the apex of console perfection, the zenith of all that is great in console gaming.Well,good fun at the very least:)
Halo is the greater, so far! However, if your console can play both, then you have the greatest.Rapture, indeed.
Bungie have done gamers proud.Hopefully, they have the right balance between graphics and gameplay.Yeah, they could have made it look absolutely amazing, but would have sacrificed the multiplayer components of the game.Just look at some of the 'flashy' style over substance of some recent games to know what i mean.Yes, i wanted top notch graphics, but above all, i want Halo gameplay.Four player co-op without loosing quality gameplay is an big achievement. I know there are people who will never...
its a glorious combination of UE ,great devs and great hardware.Although emphasis must given to the devs and hardware.
want to point out the PS3 got half a point more on what is a buggy and poor title anyway? Kudos, PS3 well done on having a slightly less crappy version :)
,but now is the time for something new. I'm getting bored with the rather plasticy look delivered by the unreal engine.I personally don't think it delivers all the 360 is capable of.
Why would EA make a public statement? Seems silly from a business perspective.Peter Moore involved? Naah, why would he be? Nothing to gain,plenty to lose.
Firstly, I'm not over keen on EA developments, but this is to do with their gameplay mechanics,not their abilities.You can't argue with their skills, sorry, you just can't.However for all you smart ar$e$ that keep quoting console 'specs', let me say, most of you know squat! You can't even use the correct notation.Again, - You can have MB, you can have Mb, but you can't have mb!!!! You can have Mhz, but you can't have mhz.If you understood even basic micro-electronics, you would know this.Anyw...
There are ways round this and other 'protection' techniques. Look and yea shall find. Stuff STEAM and similar systems!