I am going to hope you were being sarcastic, or that you are blind, hard of hearing, something that would prohibit you from gathering information correctly.
I am not even going to entertain your obviously fanboy biased opinions.
Just stop trolling.
I bet it was hard, but come on, you bought out a company that made the hardware already, if not the basic ground work for the software already completed by said company. Was it really that hard to tweek for games?
Probably, I wouldn't think anything like that would be easy. And I'd rather here this from another Microsoft employee anyways, like the R&D team, I just dont like Kudo, idk why, just seems like he wants to be cool.
I dont mean to start...
What I dont understand is how people are quick to jump the gun on something and call it a clone and something else completely revolutionary without opening their eyes.
I couldn't tell you how many news sites posted Kinect is the "FIRST" hands free motion device, when clearly the EyeToy was, and PSeye after that. (At least that I know of)
NOTE: I am not BrianB, the kid trolling up top. Thank you
I think the idea of Kinect is great, the idea of tracking your body in 3D and using it to play games. The problem is that the tech in Kinect right now is a step backwards. 30fps camera, major overhead on Xbox 360's processor, and many bugs in its current state.
And I do have to wonder about the whole venture into 3D cameras when almost every game, if not every one shown so far can be done using ...
Looking at it again it does seem that way, the sub-HD part. Plus its hard to compare when all the shots are taken at different times in the game, even if only different my a few milliseconds.
I agree completely, it's hard to compare them fairly when the pictures are not all taken at the same exact moment at the same angle.
I love that little phrase I've been seeing a lot lately, from Omega4 mainly Damage Control. Since when was a someone pointing out through video proof that something isn't the way everyones been saying it is damage control? Its called shedding light on the truth, instead of the "assumed" truth many people like yourself seem to accept.
And also what better time to release a 3D input device, like move, when they are starting 3D gaming. It makes sense to me, ...
Yea, I also remember seeing an article regarding a patent Sony made for a controller that disconnects, just like that Wii one in your post Kratos. That was just a side note.
And all you do by adding that link is show that you yourself are in the same boat as all the people supposedly sucking "their imaginary console's electric penis".
I play games to, games on consoles. Yay me.
Disagrees for the truth, why people? If I'm not mistaken you can probably find most of the stuff he's talking about in the related video section for the one in the article haha.
I'm glad to see your not confused, but it seems over here, I'm in the US, East coast, not sure where you are, they are mixing up the dates like crazy.
Dr. Marks motion control cameras like the EyeToy and PSeye are good products and were very good for their time of release. The PSeye still has better specs than Kinect, I dont mean to take it there, but it seems thats how you want to go. So should Microsoft's R&D department go back to school?
And Sony's body tracking device could be called the PSeye, it can track your body. Of course games they have out now aren't really tracking your feet or legs in to muc...
The confusion is probably over the "ship" date versus the "street" date. The ship date is when Preorders are shipped out, I assume. But you can't get your hands on it until the Street date, which is the real release date. Amazon and Gamestop here appear to be listing the Ship date.
Looks good and accurate. A little disappointed in the Auto Aim feature, cause Move should be accurate enough to just aim for yourself, but it would be nice if they had an option to turn off the auto aim.
lol, didn't expect that, thanks for the laugh movements.
@Tachyon
It all has to do with opinion really. What is too blurry for some is realistic to others. What is to cartoony for some is better graphics to others.
Believe me, I want crysis 2, but I can't help wonder when they talk their game up so much. It reminds me of Peter Molyneux with Fable. So I am very skeptical right now, but from what I'm seeing the game looks good.
Seriously this is unacceptable for a major device release like Kinect. I don't want to be the bearer of bad news, but why release a product for your market, gamers around the world, if you can not cover them all with the basic promised features like voice control in their native language?
Personally I dont care, because I would only need it to recognize English, but I wouldn't want to buy it if I was French.
Agreed, Crysis looks pretty good so far, but Rage is too bland for me. It has B E A utiful environments, but I'm just not feeling the game on a whole.
I do get a greater sense of the environment in KZ3 as well, more particle effects and stuff. Crysis looks good, but theres just not as much on screen.
lol, love your sarcasm, it does seem that a lot of people equate "fun" or "good game" to the graphics now a days. But it doesn't hurt to have good graphics and good gameplay.
No matter how many of these articles pop up its not going to convice those who can not open there eyes, and dont have the slightest idea of how business works out in the real world or how technology works for that matter, that Move is not a copy of the Wii Mote.