80/100? That's it? That game is amazing!
I can't wait to find out what Bungie has in store for us. I'm still disappointed that they teamed up with Activision though.
This whole article is quite obviously a joke.
As if PC gamers even want Kinect.
They better not wait until 2014. I want next gen consoles right now dammit!
Thank you. Glad somebody agrees with me.
Wait, people actually thought that they would be different?
I got the game for $40, so it would actually be an additional $20, and I wouldn't want it for console when I have a capable gaming PC.
Oh well. I'll be playing it completely maxed out in 1080P with 60 frames per second. Console players won't.
Doesn't matter. My PC will completely max it out with 60 fps in 1080p. Just like it does with every other Source game.
There's a hell of a lot more to the power of a GPU than the clock speeds.
Nintendo is dead, the last good thing they did was the N64. Getting up to par with outdated consoles isn't going to get my money.
Or you can play your Gamecube games on your Gamecube! *gasp*
Right now, the amount of time on the clock will end quite some time after the game is scheduled to come out.
This was a huge fail.
What do you mean "already". I've been ready for about a year or so now.
Thank you. It's good to see that someone around here knows what they are talking about. Just because Sony says it's going to last 10 years, doesn't mean they won't release a successor before that 10 years is up.
Crysis 2 on my PC uses 3Gb of RAM, so unless they want their devs to have to do a lot of streaming like Crytek did on consoles, they are going to need a fair amount more.
@Kushan
Actually, back then 512gb of RAM wasn't a huge amount, it was enough back then, but it wasn't super huge. My family's Dell from 2004 has 1gb of RAM. It was a pretty good computer back then, but it wasn't by any means a supercomputer
The rumored tech for the next gen Nintendo console is already outdated.
Hahahaha, that game looks amazing!