I thought you were going to show me something the 360 couldn't do. Btw, KZ2's ps1 quality textures are "Only possible on the ps3"!!
People bash sony pr, but I say they have done a stellar job at pulling the wool over peoples eyes regarding the ps3. The amount of misinformed sony fanboys on this site are a testament to that.
The way sony pr has avoided talking about the Cells primary function is that of a video image decoder, is pure genious. Using open ended words like "potential", and reminding every 1st party dev to lie and say "only possible on the ps3", is pr gold. I have to admit th...
I don't know what your refering to. However, I can tell you that there isn't a ps3 title currently available, in development, or that will ever be made that can't be done as good or even better on the Xbox 360.
People need to understand that the ps3 is what it is. Which is a blu-ray player masquerading as a game console. The Cell was put in the ps3 to support blu-ray. The ps3 isn't going to magically become some kind of uber console. This so called "potential" is nothing more than sony PR trying to fool foolish people.
After reading your post alongside some famous sony quotes, I've come to the conclusion that your not worthy of your username. I suggest "Pansy", "No Balls", or "Weakling"
http://next-generationsyste...
How in the hell can any American bow down to sony after listening to them publically trash our country.
Your attempt at damage control is weak, especially when compared to the things sony has said and done.
I have to ask, do you enjoy buying products from a company that has more or less publically called you personally a mindless idiot? For Christ's sake, you sony loyalists need to grow some stones.
Nice post Bloodmask. Did you notice how the author of the story sounded like every little sony minion on N4G? Pathetic.
Here are some sony quotes that should open some peoples eyes.
http://next-generationsyste...
Anyone that still follows Sony, you can consider yourself a spineless, mindless zombie
@beaver: Bioshock is 20+ hours long. Also, I'm not missing any part of these games by renting, unless you want to count extra $55 that I missed out on wasting.
And to the people that said I'm trolling. I'll have you know that it doesn't matter what platform a game is on, if a game is less than 12 hours and has no multi-player, in my book it's a $5 rental, not a $60 purchase. It's morons like you people buying these games that are signaling devs it's OK to charge $60 for a 6-12 ...
10 hours + no multi-player = rental at best.
Like the way Sony is synonimous with exploding batteries.
Is the "Monument" ad the next one, or is it old?
I would like to have that diorama. The detail in the figures is stunning.
Given it's better than $500-$600, it still isn't a mainstream pricepoint.
Not because I say so, but because it's been proven time and time again in multi-plats, developer interviews, and the fact that I've seen it with my own two eyes.
The hardware in the ps3 is indeed inferior for gaming applications in comparison to the 360.
Who really cares, the ps3 is a flop. The best online service will continue to be Live.
Sony says-- "Your going to adopt blu-ray, I don't care if we have to shove it up your ***!!!"
1. If the ps3 was in the lead. It would be the lead platform for multi-plats. Any non-sony gamer would suffer because of the ps3's inferior GAMING hardware. Just like they did with the ps2.
2. Console makers don't need to think it's OK to sell their console at a ludicrous pricepoint.
3. Sony isn't making gaming their primary focus (blu-ray movie format), and it shows. They need to be shown that that is unacceptable for a game console maker.
as long as 360 finishes ahead of the ps3 in the U.S. is all that matters to me. Simply because, that's where i live.
But I know Snake gets the "Biggest Pervert Award"