But you failed to mention that the 360's current and upcoming library IS the most diverse and of the highest quality of any current gen console.
This review was probably more important than all gaming media sites combined.
Actually, avoiding obvious facts shows how infantile you are. Say you wanted to buy a computer, and started searching for product reviews. Which would you consider a better source, PC World or K-mart? Stop being a dumb****, your wrong and no amount of spin or fanboy bs is going to change that.
You are wrong, and you know it. PC is a whole different platform, with a whole different type of audience. Why not have PC gamers review Wii and handheld titles? I'll tell you why, because PC gamers don't understand the audience that plays these games. This site has no business reviewing a console game. If Halo 3 ever goes to pc, that would be the correct time to give a review. Until then this PC World review is nothing more than a low-handed attempt to get web hits.
Since when is a PC only gamer considered an expert on console games? Of course this review is biased.
Another 15 minutes and it would have shown the ending.
Might I ask why a PC mag is reviewing a 360 game? That would be like TeamXbox reviewing a PS3 game.
The art style is the same, but I think the difference in graphics quality is obvious. Take a look for yourself....
lol that's funny, and inspiring too. If MS marketed a JP teen interactive porn game, and kept it from the pc market, then exclusive to 360, sales would skyrocket. Ever wonder how Snake became a geriatric pervert? Too bad the the ESRB steps in,otherwise sexually sick 60 year olds would be cool (wait he's still cool to some of you). Gross.
PS3= second rate gaming. WAIT!1 please!!, just wait. Even though we had blu-ray in mind when we built the ps3, please don't forget us. Even though we more or less publically called all of you morons, your should still buy a ps3.
http://digg.com/gaming_news...
How many pansies does it take to buy a ps3? Just one.
Fool yourself all you want to, I could careless, When you start feeding people d*ng just because your a blind idiot, then we have an issue. Here is sony's money maker, the cpu that is built for current-gen gaming, the Untapable, FRANK processor.
http://www.eetimes.com/rss/...
Are you serious? The Frank processor will take 5-6 years for devs to use it eff...
If the story and characters in the MGS weren't so infantile I might have liked the series. The 3rd person,fixed camera gameplay of the MGS series is also clumsy and not to my liking.
Add 1000 hours to Halo 3, it has multi-player.
Nice try braintrust.
The context of what the reporter is saying is that Halo 3 could be the final nail in the ps3's coffin. And it's not a far fetched idea, in the U.S. atleast.
With the price, sony arrogance, and cgi lies, the ps3 was supposed to come out of the gate blowing the 360 away. Instead, the ps3 launched and turned out to be an inferior game machine to the 360, and $200 more expensive no less. How stupid do you expect people to be?
Also, do you think it's smart for a console maker to put in a cpu that will take 5-6 years for developers to learn how to use efficiently. No it's not, and sony didn't do that to be "future proof". Sony ...
If the sales for ps1 and ps2 were in the toilet, sony would have quit making them alot earlier. The way it stands now, ps3 won't last for another 4 years.
He doesn't know the future. Judging from the present, ps3 is a rip-off and not the best choice for a current gen game machine. "Future proof" is just another pr fluff word, kind of like "potential".
whose the dumb f*** trying to minimalize achievements? Look sony kids, the ps3 is't half the game machine of the 360. You might as well get used to that fact.
The individual MUTE feature on Xbox Live is two clicks away and it's permanent (unless turned off), and that's for all games, not just the one your playing.