@talltony...
I am a Sony leg humper and I hate sales since the PS3 is always dead last.
I hate sales because it directly show how many people agree that the game is actually great and not just in my mind and a few other Sony leg humpers that think that anything Sony makes is AAA.
That's right boy... Sales are a true indicator of an opinion shared by an x amount of people...
Sales may not indicate if a game is good for you personally.. but i...
@PirateThom - There is two ways to look at Project Natal and it's obvious that you already picked aside.
There is one group that see Natal as a potential that can introduce new game experiences. That can make games more interactive and even work along side with the control.
The other group (The one you are in) see Natal as a failure and see "not a single game genre, outside casual mini-games, that will be suited to Natal."...
I mean... forget g...
lol! every time I see one of Sony leg humper comment on how Sony's eye toy is capable of doing what Project Natal can I have to make sure I am not drinking anything in order not to spray my computer monitor...
How stupid and dumb can they be.
Stupid and dumb not because they are wrong but because they do not bother to understand better what is it that they are arguing.
For example, Sony's PS3 EyeToy is a regular camera... it's technology is practically t...
whatever happened? easy.. Sony promised and failed to deliver as they've done with practically everything.
But they succeded as getting people to buy a PS3 based on hope that these promises would come to reality.
What else is new?
@goflyakite - that's it? That's all you have to say on this matter?... let me get this straight... you stop what you were doing... read and attempt to read my comment but fail to understand the point I was trying to make... then proceed to comment on my comment... ohh wow... though I love the attention I get from Sony leg humpers such as yourself.. but revolving your comments around mine may outside of your job description. Now go hump someone 's else leg.. not mine.
lol... exactly my point... you Sony leg humpers are too dumb... and since by nature you are all graphic whores that's all Sony have to do to keep you happy... not even release the game but give you a demo that you had to pay for.
For example, GT5P developers focus most system resources on the car model while lacking lots of the features like crash and customization that Forza 2 had.
Even the environment on Forza 2 vs GT5 P was superior... GT5P barely had any trees an...
Forza 3 better than GT5? What the hell is GT5?
I mean Forza 2 was suppose to be compared to GT5 not Forza 3... and yet Sony leg humpers are waiting...
What's going to be the next article?
Forza 4 better than GT5? lol!
Of course Forza 3 is better... Forza 3 is almost gold and it's features are known... The last news about GT5 was that it was going to have crash... lol... do we know about customization? What features does it have?
"Talking shít 24/7 with no proof. "...
well I somehow agree... with the no proof... since Sony failed to show proof that they can match or do better than turn 10.
GT5 was announced even before Forza 2... and now Forza 3 will come out and yet GT5 still have no release date.
So tell me... who's fault is it that Turn 10 does the talking and showing 2 games and yet Sony's "proof" is still no where.
"Microsoft has an irritating habit of attempting to tear down the competition while simultaneously promoting their own; a marketing tactic we don't see as often from either Sony..."
ohh.. boy the mind of a Sony leg humper...
During Sony's conference as the speaker said many times... "xxx can only be possible on the PS3"... you wouldn't call that "tear down the competition"?
Here are some of the quotes to remind people of how...
it seems like now that GT5 found it's match and Turn 10 has openly challenge any developer to do better... now people want Turn 10 to shut up and say nothing...
How about GT5 developers and others bring it up and counter Turn 10 statements with the release of a game that actually match it.
what are you implying that Metal Gear sucks? Metal Gear is probably the most annoying games requiring initial installation + chapter installs.
Though it's considered one of the best if not the best PS3 game... the PS3 didn't save people from that.
For those that own a PS3 and xbox 360 they should do what most people should do. Pick up the platform where multiplatform perform better... the xbox 360. Problem solve.
lol! of course you find it disrespectful and insulting.. because it's something that give other developers the challenge to prove them wrong.
When developers that make games like Lair, Kill Zone 2, GT5 start saying, "This game can only be made on the PS3" knowing that their games will never give the xbox 360 hardware the chance to prove that statement than is good.
Turn 10 are confident their game kicks @$$... GT5 developers don't like that statement? Well ...
sad microsoft has to be stating the obvious. Only sony leg humpers are making a big deal out something that's not an issue.
Where does this issue come from? Well someone figured that since Natal uses infrared and infrared is known for having issues detecting dark objects in the dark.. then the remote must have issues too.
It never occur to these people that if Natal don't work on dark skin people.. than another technology would have to be used. I mean duhh!
lol... I don't get what the big hype of a game based on a movie... don't they all suck? or at least 99% of them?
Don't both xbox 360 and PS3 have enough down the line to put false hope on this?
"They are currently developing Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 and Quantum exclusively for the PlayStation 3 and surely there has to be a reason for this." lol!... hello... Why would any xbox 360 buy an upgrade to a game they already have for $60?
Tecmo is still around? Itagaki no longer work there which means Tecmo needs to first prove that they can manage without him.
When this game comes out.. and people care enough to buy it... than Tecmo or wherever is left of it...
as I said before... why the hate against valve for wanting to stick to their root (be a PC developer)?
How about the various PS3 developers that though are not own by Sony rather work with the PS3 only instead of making their games on the xbox 360 or the PC for that matter?
Take Kojima for example... I don't see PS3 leg humper b!tch!ng about him only making games on the PS3. The rumor is that he is not even directing the xbox 360 game he announced but someone else. ...
"Then why do companies make more money on the PS3 than on the Xbox 360? EA? Ubisoft? Konami? " lol.... you can't be that ignorant...
This should be obvious... shouldn't?
First keep Konami out of the picture.. since Konami and Kojima refused to bring their biggest franchise to the xbox 360...
EA and Ubisoft for the most part PORT games to the PS3. That means that games are first made on the xbox 360 and then ported to the PS3.
Anyon...
the PS3 is "Too complicated" to what it's worth.
Valve is one of the best game developers out there... so, the whole "Lazy" argument do not apply to them.
If you think otherwise please named what Sony first party game made FPS more influential than Counter Strike and Half-Life. Please go one and name them.
To understand where Valve stand one must go back at their history... They are not known to support consoles since they are primari...
"therefore KZ2 won FPS of the year"!!! hahahahaha!
That was a good one...
What makes a great AAA game?
How good or great a game is... it's a matter of individual preference.
It's possible for a game you hate to be loved by someone else and therefore be a AAA for him or her and piece of crap for you.
If this is the case; if games are a matter of opinion... than how can a game be AAA then?
At the individual ...
lol... Infamous was hyped like every other Sony game and sold like very other Sony game. What else is new?