As far as trailers go... that was... A trailer. Yeah...
At this point, they might as well have just came out and SAID what they were doing rather than this. This was the least helpful teaser for a batman IP I think I've ever seen lmao. I'm definitely biased, in that teaser trailers never do anything for me, but this was especially so after the Suicide Squad disaster.
Funny that it's performing so well, and yet Square Enix constantly states that it didn't meet their goals and expectations. They've historically had a big problem with expecting astronomical sales on every one of their games, then expressing disdain when it doesn't meet those near impossible goals. How they get this wrong every time is beyond me...
But I'm glad that it's continuing to sell well in the grand scheme outside of their expectations. I'...
Ex-Act-Ly
THAT part.
It's really not censorship. It's a change based on an unintended consequence. There's really no indication that it was something they even realized could be interpreted or construed as something else. Assets sometimes get placed in weird ways they don't realize until after. It's that simple.
Glad it got removed- Honestly it seems like an honest mistake by the sounds of how they reuse that asset throughout the game. Unfortunate placement more so than anything, even if it was unintentional, but their response and willingness to fix it is what matters more than the mistake.
Either way, I'm excited to play this today!
Oh hell yeah! I feel like this was one hell of an underrated game, and I'm glad to see that a part 2 is coming.
If I remember correctly, they stated their recent Blizzard acquisition as a way to stay competitive with Nintendo and Sony, not specifically to profit across platforms. Of course, the end goal is always profits, but they've also made a bunch of exclusives that haven't made their way to other platforms yet, with more on the way.
I imagine the other acquisitions were for the same reason, but I could be wrong. They recognize that most of their offerings aren't to ...
Pro: More people getting to experience a game they weren't able to before.
Con: Hearing either Lucas or Ness yell "PK fire" ever again.
This, and this again. I wish people were more willing to just look at the facts, instead of blaming what's happening in the entertainment industry as "woke propaganda." Well said, and backed by real applicable points given the circumstances.
I'd add, that there's been an ever increasing pressure on publishers (the tech and entertainment industry as a whole) to only ever expect exponential growth, without factoring in reference points and consumption be...
I'd actually argue it's likely more on Xbox, cuz what other relative exclusives are they playing instead?
I don't think anyone could have predicted how popular this game would be. But it's clear from reception that the market is hungry for an intense and intentional, cross platform co op experience.
Contrary to your arbitrary argument, this game didn't fail due to "wokeness" lol.
It’s easily one of the best rpgs of all time.
Deservedly so!
While I agree, I think the point is to have the option. Some people really love that part of NMS (which you can also speed up) where you get to be engaged with all aspects of traversal.
I just saw it on the front page. It's all based on how much traction it gets overall compared to other news. This article just came out, and more are now lol.
Sure there's a market for it, there's a market for nearly anything. My point is mostly, that we all have a phone and/or computer (hopefully a computer as well) and I've run remote play on a laptop and it's worked surprisingly well. I've even live streamed to platforms while remote playing, which was bandwidth intensive, but manageable.
We have ways of doing this now. There will still be things that are hard to read even on a screen as comfy as this one,...
Can't you just remote play to your phone and use a controller with it?
I wouldn't be surprised if there were more people playing Avengers before they pulled the plug.