Exactly!
You love it because you know you're speaking nonsense. Don't drag PlayStation (a company who has already released MULTIPLE AAA titles this year) into what is happening here. It only makes YOU look triggered, not the people you so desperately want to bother.
Nope, sure shouldn't have.
Yeah, the crickets will be loud for this one. The typical suspects will stay under their rocks and it makes you realize how deep their hypocrisy is.
OT: This is highly unacceptable.
As a matter of fact, they had one before Microsoft did.
Actually, yes, they do, because higher end systems are never the target configs. When PC devs targeted higher end systems, games like Crysis, S.T.A.L.K.E.R., and F.E.A.R. were born.
If high-end PCs were ever the focus, games would look absolutely ridiculous, miles better than anything consoles could produce, but doing so is not financially viable. So they target lower end machines. Even most "Recommended Specs" are nowhere close to the best or very high-end, such...
"Sony relies on IMMEDIATE ROI from PlayStation because it's their leading branch".
It's an important segment, but they don't "rely" on it. Electronics/Products makes a crap ton for them as well (hadn't realized Game and Network Services made them so much money, glad to see it, and it fits my point nicely). Obviously what they are doing is working as they make the second most in the entire industry, only behind Tencent. Thus, they DEFINITE...
Wrong. Financial Services is Sony's leading branch financially.
Obviously, they don't need the trillions, as they both make more money in their gaming segments than Xbox does.
And no, neither Sony nor Nintendo would "go bankrupt" under said conditions, regardless of how misinformed you are.
It's funny that the trillion dollar company needed Game Pass because everything they were doing wasn't working. That's not something the other two need to follow when their brands are many times bigger tha...
Sony doesn't need Game Pass either.
Cate to elaborate? Biological men CANNOT BE biological women. It’s on you to prove otherwise if that’s “not true”.
Nothing about that trailer looked better than the best of last gen. It doesn't look bad, but yes, the best looking last gen games are more striking.
They've HAD those opportunities and have yet to win a gen. They need every region PlayStation dominates to cooperate and it's going to take more than promises from acquired studios.
The GameCube definitely was. It was actually more powerful than the PS2.
You mean NVMe. M.2 drives can also come be SATA SSDs, which are cheaper and slower than their NVMe brethren.
Regardless, NVMe prices are definitely coming down, particularly if you're still on Gen 3 like myself, which has a max throughput of 3.5GB/s on the M.2 bus (although even that top speed will never be seen — very similar to that fancy "teraflop" word that many people [particularly console fanatics] love to tout these days).
I'm sure you know that better than Sony...
I mean, yeah, I'll keep thinking that as long as you have nothing compelling to offer. You made a claim that is baseless and are doubling down on it. The inaction speaks for itself.
"lol" is exactly the response I'd expect from someone with no argument. :)
Uh, why did you put rigs in quotations? That's exactly what they are. One might say that you just wish you had one. Could be a ridiculous saying, but then again, so was your post.
OT: On the actual topic (or more properly, to you SirBruce), people with those high-end PCs already enjoy GTA with mods that blow that Remaster footage away. I know being a console-only person doesn't offer that same experience, but that's also no one's fault. I don't fault peo...
He knows that, he’s just on the “opposing view” because it’s PlayStation. If Xbox generated this much, and more than PlayStation, it’d be a whole different tune.
Truth is Sony has the winning model and should keep doing exactly what has won them generation(s).