bullsh't!
there are plenty of games that run at 60fps on current consoles, so it's really just limitations from dice, not the ps3 or 360. also, i agree with the people who say they'd rather have a game run at 60fps rather than have "amazing" visuals, which for some reason, dice believes are mutually exclusive.
i was actually looking forward to this game, but now i'm not so sure.
i wish there would have been something about mgs5 and/or agent.
new suggestion: wait before buying any capcom game for a minimum of six months. that way you can make see if they're coming out with an "ultimate" edition, i.e. super street fighter 4, resident evil 5 gold edition, etc.
that's appalling, and callous. they should be ashamed of themselves...until people buy it, then the purchasers are the ones who should feel shame. if less people lined capcom's pockets on these rehashes, they'd have less of an impetus to be making them.
Check out the blog that I wrote regarding this story. I'm looking for any constructive criticism, and to see who agrees or disagrees with my assessment.
Thanks.
goodness. i couldn't care less about zoe 3; give us another metal gear, kojima san!
what do you expect? the 3ds's button layout is not as versatile as the ps3's or 360's. it is an innovative way of dealing with the limitations. i like it.
with these portables now costing as much as consoles, it will take me a while to get either one of them :-/
at first it sounded a bit outlandish, but the more i read it, the more i could see it happening. to me, it seems to be in a similar vein as heavy rain. if kojima makes it i will be mildly disappointed though, because i think i'd rather see a new metal gear solid game. i wish he would have made peacewalker for the ps3.
dumb-asses. they should have considered that before they made their purchases, then they wouldn't have to get a refund. as they old adage says: buyer beware.
activision is obviously in cahoots with microsoft, since ms has fallen off and has less and less must-have exclusives. so rather than paying companies for exclusive rights, which would be much costlier, they can just pay the developers and publishers to make an inferior product on competitors' consoles, that ...
world at war was not that bad. black ops looks superlative, and a like huge leap forward. the story seems much improved, the graphics are more polished, and the gameplay appears to be more refined. it has the makings of a great fps.
i'm getting sick of reading reviews where the person gripes about how it is not enough like the old castlevania games. if they want a game that plays like the old ones, then play those instead of buying a new game and expecting it to be a retread. so many of these people are full of sh!t, especially when they complain about how too many games are just derivatives of their previous installments.
hell yeah!
i would have liked to have seen it at the last e3, because rumors have been swirling around about this for a while now. when mgs peacewalker came out i was planning on getting the bundle, but held out waiting for the psp2.
had this happen twice. the first time i payed the $150 to replace my 60gb with another 60gb. the second time around i got the 120gb, but no bc.
they need to stop f'cking over the ps3 owners by charging them more for dlc. that is f'n bullsh!t
there will probably be soviet zombies, and vietcong zombies.
this may have been a big deal ten years ago; today, it seems like peoples' excitement is mostly due to the fact that it had been delayed for so long and it may finally have a definitive release date.
after the first modern warfare, the sequel's multi-player got boring quickly. luckily, this time around they are making dramatic enough changes that i think it will keep me playing for longer.
*nods in agreement*