i find angry birds to be completely dull and unengaging. its a poor man's "boom blox," when you get down to it.
youre just mad because it has sony games on it. we all know your comment history
i would rather have a legend of dragoon remake, personally
i didnt get a code
meanwhile, im sure they are working on FFXIII-3
I remember a month ago when Jim got his panties in a wad over this guy on youtube called "general G" who was trolling pc fanboys. Jim is a butthurt PC fanboy
farcry 3 alone looks better than halo 4 in every single way. it has infinitely superior graphics, superior gunplay, a cover system, larger level design, a first person brutal melee system (the best we have ever seen), and an in depth leveling system.
if you think halo 4 looks better than farcry 3, you are just deluded. plain and simple. Farcry 3 is better in every way.
halo 4 is not even in my top 20 most anticipated games. what did they show at E3 that was so impressive? there was not a SINGLE thing in that gameplay that was innovative or top teir for the FPS genre.
Farcry 3, Borderlands 2, and bioshock infinite destroy it in graphics, gunplay, level design, gameplay depth, and immersion.
with halo, its all about name recognition and not actual content presented. the same goes for black ops 2, which looks like utter garbag...
it just looks like star wars BF2 only with worse graphics.
its hard for me to fathom playing a game in those graphics that still doesn't have ironsights
4 player co-op and regenerating health
Its like the tension, scaryness, and intensity are dissolving before my eyes
considering they only get 3 or so exclusives per year from the same milked franchises, it makes sense that they would sell more. 360 owners just dont get a selection of exclusives
enough with the ?/6 scores. that scale is absurd.
and yeah, the game is crap
have any of these people played "haunting grounds" (a cult classic survival horror game)? themes of rape are not a new thing in video games.
needs moar jackets
i would have no problem with it if they didnt drag spyro into it.
if this game were on the 3ds, it would be getting 9s and 10s across the board.
i don't even feel like addressing people like this. Ebert is an old, pretentious shriv, who understands nothing of the video game medium.
from the article
"It’s a struggle between loud, assaultive, photorealistic game design that rewards wispy attention spans while demanding minimal problem-solving skills of its players and … games where shotguns to the face and chainsaws to the jugular are not so essential."
wow. this person's...
a 75? really? this is one of the best portable games ever made and it sets all sorts of high watermarks for handelds in terms of its scope, visuals, and controls. I dont understand what scale you could possible be using in order for this game to have a 75. its nonsense
and yet people say "no one likes arcade rail shooters"