yeah, its the best version
if you want a version with virtually no community, worse graphics, and an inferior controller for shooters.
i find the whole notion that this tablet controller thing is going to become an industry norm to be quite humorous. a year from now, no one is going to give a crap about this sort of tech. its pointless, superficial garbage.
the wii u is destined to be nintendo's biggest home console flop. microsoft and sony have no reason to emulate its tech
http://bgr.com/2012/12/28/n...
sony is probably not going to use the whole vita second screen thing with many games. and honestly, there is no reason for them to. the wii u's gimmick is not selling (especially not compared to the motion gaming craze) and the general consensus has been that it ranges from usable to irritating.
i saw one guy in the comment section of the article saying
"For me the Wii U is great not because you can split the screen, but because you can play full con...
jesus christ. 2015? TEN YEARS after kingdom hearts 2, they are finally releasing a full, legitimate console based sequel? i cant even be excited anymore. there is no reason why this franchise needed to skip an entire console generation.
Square enix has got to be the most incompetent, out of touch, moronic video game company on the face of the earth. im sure we can count on 5 more FFXIII sequels before kingdom hearts 3 sees the light of day. and what about FF verses? I guess w...
hahaha.... I got a good laugh out of that comment.
http://i.imgur.com/UTBPj.jp...
yeah, that wii u sure looks like its going to be a big problem for sony and microsoft. im sure they are just quaking in fear
i think $500 is a bit more reasonable. it would certainly be enough to be a huge leap over the current consoles and the wii u.
anyone wanting or expecting the next xbox and playstation consoles to be $400 or less is deluding themselves. pure and simple.
motion control gaming is dead. i dont think sony is going to be implementing this crap in the PS4. or at least, I hope they dont
30 frames per second is practically inevitable. devs want to stretch the textures and effects to the furthest level possible. so, it inevitably will cut into the frame rate.
our self destructive drug war, underfunded schools, and non-rehabilitative prisons are why we have such high crime rates and why we are the prison capital of the world. way to shirk responsibility once again, politicians.
its sad that someone like Joe Manchin can actually be a part of so-called "liberal party," in the US.
it seems that neither party values fundamental rights, like free speech and expression
- 1.243125GHz CPU (per core)
- 549.999755MHz GPU
- 1 GB ram for OS and 1 GB for games
well..... that certainly explains alot. If this is true, then its downright pathetic. next gen, my ass.
and there are people who honestly think that sony and microsoft wont top this by a considerable margin with their new consoles in 2013? what are these people smoking?
I think you can never have too much ram, especially if you are trying to future proof the next 6 years. but 16gb may be a little more costly than its worth.
prepare yourself for 6 years of disappointment, bitterness, and indignation, waiting for that "next gen" wii u experience.
hell, I bet it will be 2 or 3 years before the wii u gets anything that even looks as good as uncharted 3 or gears 3.
i find this whole debacle quite humorous. people ask me
"are you looking forward to next gen?"
and, as a joke, I tell them with a serious face
"...
its a little late for that. its not really a realistic option. i dont think that will happen.
Once again, nintendo and their fans are just going to have to deal with an underpowered gimmick console, bereft of third party multiplat support for the next generation. simple as that.
sony, microsoft, and valve dont even see the wii u as competition. they act like it doesnt exist. and so do third party devs, which is why pretty much none of them want to develop fo...
i don't know why people were disappointed with the wii u. or rather, I dont know why people were surprised by the wii u.
I predicted that it would be gimmicky, graphically underpowered, and lacking third party support from the moment it was announced. it wasn't too difficult
this is the same thing we saw at E3. i want to see more of the game, dammit
its one of the worst mainstream consoles and one of the worst nintendo consoles. I mean, stuff like the Jaguar and CDI will always be the worst consoles period.
the walking dead fanboys keeping spouting "its great! its great!" when people say it doesnt deserve GOTY. yeah, as if the other nominees were just piles of crap.
I mean, have you guys played Journey? have you played mass effect 3? im sorry, but those games DESTROY the walking dead. and yes, i have played it.
luckily not all waking dead fans are pretentious beyond belief. I know many people who played through it and loved it, who openly admit that t...
im generally happy with sony's smaller exclusives. it good to have diversity. we dont want an industry desaturated into only a few AAA franchises that get pumped out every year.
im just laughing at all the nintendo fanboys in this comment section trying to convince themselves that this is a good port. buyers remorse at its best