How is AT&T overrated if nobody likes them?
Minecraft too!?!? THEY'RE DESTROYING EVERYTHING I LOVE!!!! D:
I've never really been an RPG fan, but this game intrigues me. I'm planning on picking this up when it comes out. I love games that try to create that "living world" feeling. Heck, I could just run around all hunting animals in Red Dead and have fun.
I played this at my local Best Buy (with Kinect.) I didn't enjoy it much. I find the game itself interesting, but the kinect controls are clunky. You have to push fairly hard to shoot, hard enough that it seems like a long play period might hurt my arm a bit. Also, when you push forward the reticle continues to move, so it becomes shaky mid-shot. Overall, the Kinet wasn't really accurate at detecting my hand and had a bit of glitching out. It may have been the lighting conditions at t...
Hey, at least the PS3 is getting ME3. I think we should be thankful that the only feature we're not getting doesn't add much to actual gameplay. Don't get me wrong, this looks cool, but in the end, I don't want to be shouting in my living room the entire time I'm playing a video game. It's not exactly practical.
This is my number one most anticipated PSN game for 2011. I absolutely loved Flower (FlOw, not so much), so I hope this game can come through for me.
This is my number one most anticipated PSN game for 2011. I absolutely loved Flower (FlOw, not so much), so I hope this game can come through for me.
Dont forget ARMA 2 AO!
... Nope. Not buying it. I was pretty excited for MW3 (I know, I have bad taste), but promised myself that if there was ANY sort of subscription, I wouldn't get it. If this ends up happening and it's successful, then every game will have a subscription. It happened with 15 dollar map packs, and it'll happen with this. I certainly don't want that. As a consumer, I'm sending the message with my wallet.
... Nope. Not buying it. I was pretty excited for MW3(I know, I have bad taste), but promised myself that if there was ANY sort of subscription, I wouldn't get it. If this ends up happening and it's successful, then every game will have a subscription. It happened with 15 dollar map packs, and it'll happen with this. I certainly don't want that. As a consumer, I'm sending the message with my wallet.
So in the EU, Super Stardust HD gets replaced by Ratchet and Clank? Darn, I'm in the US, I just recently bought Super Stardust, and only one of the games on the list interests me (Infamous). If I could, Ratchet and Clank would be my 2nd choice. I guess I'll have to get LBP, but that game was never my cup o' tea.
I am updating right now! SWEET! Not sure if PSN is going to be back online though...
So then only the people who do something special deserve the right to be called a journalist? I don't really think you get the concept of journalism. What about those that humbly sit and write a news piece for the newspaper? What would you call them. They work hard, too. Granted, they're not climbing mountains searching for the secrets of the world, but if they didn't do the job, who would? What about people who find info that isn't going to risk their job? Do journalists only...
If a dev team doesn't listen to their fans: BWAH, this game hasn't changed in years, it's just a cash cow now, look at all the stupid people just falling for whatever the devs want to do.
If a dev team DOES listen to their fans: The devs are too wishy washy, the game's been ruined because of stupid requests, The devs ought to make their own game instead of a game for everyone.
Shouldn't everyone already know about this thing called "B...
"please anyone can start up a web and get an interview like that nowadays *cough*HHG*cough*"
That doesn't make it any less legitimate of an interview, nor does it make the facts any less factual. And if research is easy to find, does that make it any less legitimate? of course not! those things are still what they are.
And, just for the record, I'd like you to tell me why people outside of gaming deserve their titles as journalists.
OHRLY!?!?
Well, what do you consider it when someone finds out about some new weapons in a game through an interview with a developer, or when someone uncovers a hidden game announcement deep in the bowels of a website's code?
Give me a source, some evidence of their supposed "compromises." If you do, and I deem it legitimate proof, I'll change my stance and apologize for wasting your time. As of now though, I have not seen one incident of this. In fact, many of the games I've seen advertised on there have gotten bad scores.
As for fanboys, I agree that perhaps they do some of that, but who really cares? Alot of their fanboy-riling articles I've actually found quite funny.
:O
If I were her parent... I would probably die of shock before I could think of a suitable punishment. And they're just sitting there laughing...
This is what happens when we grow up in a society full of apathy.
If you hadn't noticed beforehand, that entire section of the preview seems tongue-in-cheek to me.
"I'm curious how fans will react when they're placed in the shoes of a minority. Will Graves speak to them? Will they even have the maturity to contemplate this instead of just spewing forth the typical vitriol of an Internet gaming message board?"
Sounds tongue-in-cheek to me.
He only stresses it so much perhaps because he was sim...
Good. Can we please stop complaining now?