I put no faith in rumors.
"I think you are exaggerating. COD4's campaign was pretty fun, but we all know that what really made that game shine was its online component."
Agreed. From what I understand, the single player was mildly epic, but isn't isn't STILL being played right now because it's so much fun all by your lonely. Killzone 2 will be played long after the 8-10 hour campaign mode is completed, but this tool would know nothing about that because he chose not to experience the epic-soun...
Interesting. I don't recall "boasting" about anything. Your insecurities are irrelevant to me; don't try to make them my problem.
Although, I will note that you are attempting to make a few jaggies on close-ups a bigger deal than SD vs. HD content, for an equal amount of money, all dependent on what console you purchase it on. I find that almost amusing.
Ah, and the second part of your comment is insecure fanboy dribble, which is worthy of neither a quo...
I spent some time looking through your commenting history. Based on that, I can easily see that you'd claim the 360 version was superior even if it was the graphical equal to Eternal Champions on the 32X. Your opinion is irrelevant.
This is going to be a train wreck when it actually goes live on the site.
...did you just try to link to me Eurogamer? Seriously? You may as well of chosen GameSpot for all the good it's going to do.
That was kinda my point.
Are you smoking bat guano? The games are EXACTLY THE SAME!!!!
But can Noby Noby Boy be toasted?
Check my comment at the site, Sev.
Agreed! PEGGLE!!
Kinda sucks for 360 RE fans, but at least they get the extras in some sort of format, and PS3 RE fans don't get shafted out of the HD experience.
I had no idea that you couldn't have an XBL Gold membership with any e-mail address. That's just stupid; why in the hell would they do that?
But you better promise me, I'll be back in time!
So? How the hell do you review only one part of a game and call it a game review? Should a game like Burnout:Paradise be reviewed while ignoring the incredible online options? Or CoD4? Halo? Resistance 2?
That's downright idiotic. You can't pick and choose which part of a game you want to review and then give the game a score based on what you chose to play. Play the entire game, or don't review it. Period point blank.
So, this guy didn't play the entire game, but still decided to review it? What kind of bullsh!t is that?
"lol its actually one of GG games..but GG didnt make this they sold the rights to this game to someone..edios i guess"
I vaguely remember that . . . it's the game they made before Sony acquired them, right? That game, if I recall, sucked.
".to yet another failure by Guerilla Games. Apparently the devs that took over the IP wanted to remain faithful to the original. :o"
*facepalms* This comment would be funny were it not so pathetic....
What the hell is ShellShock? Is it a Ninja Turtles game?
And yet, has not one single thing to do with this story.
I wonder if concessions had to be made given the size limitations of DVD9?