My guess is new IPs, Forza proper 6, Gears Collection, the good stuff etc. This is probably the time to rethink your trolling agenda.
"Freebies" that he paid $50 per year for, and has to keep the subscription in order to keep the games (staying loyal). Sony can't, for some reason, deliver on their promise. That's the least they can do. You spin this into some entitlement issue. Why? Sony PR paying you a dollar for every comment defending their mistakes?
The least surprising out of the bunch is LR: FFXIII.
"Microsoft 1 year from now: xbox 1 will get........."
Quality first party games?
@OB1
I used to be really biased for PlayStation here on N4G, but Xbox has the throne this generation, even though I own and play my Wii U and PS4 probably about the same as my Xbox One.
So if I am a fanboy, I am an Xbot, Xboner, or whatever label in between.
They can afford to if the 360 was sold at a much bigger loss at launch. The Xbox One should be much cheaper to manufacture from day 1 than the 360 with a tri-core Power PC CPU, and a bleeding edge GPU that challenged gaming PCs even more expensive than my current build at the time.
The Xbox One by contrast is saddled with a cheap tablet CPU and a cheap low-end GPU. How can they not afford to sell this at $350?
The PSN+ version is just a glorified demo. If they liked the game, chances are they would've bought the full retail version as a result of trying out the currently nonexistent PSN+ version.
As for being cheap, you have to pay for PSN+ in order to even have it...that is if Sony releases it. At least that's how it seems.
This means Tales of games will be bought off the used games rack. It's a shame, really. Tales of is my favorite JRPG series nowadays, but I will not support game companies against #gamergate.
Micro-transactions, add-ons, paid advantages over the free player (pay to win schemes), and advertisements? If that's what you want...
I'll buy it eventually. I actually enjoyed Dead Island to some extent. It's very well a cult franchise, but that's not necessarily bad for the fans.
Xbox One is still going to get more out of the hardware than it currently is. That's the point. No need to shoehorn the competition into a discussion that has nothing to do with it.
Well, handhelds are consoles as well.
In terms of first party content:
Wii U > Xbox One > PS4
In terms of third party content:
Xbox One > PS4 > Wii U
In terms of variety and amount of games:
PC > every console from the past few generations combined.
Pokemon 7th gen for the New 3DS? Nintendo would really push sales.
They haven't improved PSN "drastically," at least not on the uptime availability. PSN still goes down for maintenance pretty often even during peak hours. You can guess what service was offline the most this holiday season.
With cheap digital-only games that PSN+ mostly offers now? My subscription is going to end soon and will not renew it until more retail games are offered by the service.
I also rarely ever play online on consoles, so there is very little reason left to pay for PSN+ since their game offerings have become mediocre.
Nice hit magnet, but I outsmarted that. Sorry Gamersftw.co.uk
I got this on Xbox One, but haven't played it yet. $30 was a price I felt comfortable paying for a game I am not too sure of.
Making a new system takes years. Sony, for example, started the very early stages of PS4 development in 2008, and it released late 2013. But yeah, it would be a good idea for Nintendo to work on a new system now even if the Wii U has a few years before being succeeded.
Hard drive for me. They're pretty cost effective.