Someone will still waste their money on it regardless what the price is.
Xbox One is the best console that let you watch TV on your TV. It's brilliant isn't it?
All jokes put aside MS has the luxury of persuading cable providers and channel owners like Viacom to let them stream their content on the Xbox One.
You do realize E.T attribute to the video game crash of 1983 right?
I rather have a company to make no games than a abomination like E.T.
There's pretty of game developing companies I wish would stop making games but ID isn't one of them. A good example would be Hammerpoint Interactive, the people behind the War Z aka Infestation: Survival Stories.
The review is one paragraph longer than DW7 review and one point lower.
Regardless what OXM gives it, I still plan on buying it.
At first I thought this would a Cliffy B style rant about how consoles aren't going to survive because blah blah blah AAA budget blah blah blah.
"Having a system that just reads controller input, makes a screen image and outputs it to the TV isn't going to work, no matter how rich the media it's producing."
This method is on every platform whether its pc, consoles, handhelds or mobile devices. I doubt this will change for a long time....
If it had release at the time it was suppose would it have been profitable for Ubisoft?
If they had release it first on the WiiU and released the PS3 and Xbox 360 down the line with boss battle and 40 news levels, I'm pretty sure WiiU owners wouldn't been happy. They would've complain about not getting same treatment.
Well here's to hoping content won't get ripped out and label as dlc.
Far as MP I wouldn't mind seeing something similar to what Warframe does. Sitting around killing stuff for 10 rounds can get boring and dull after a while. Some PvP option would be cool too.
It sad thing to say but true. Fans of the first Bayonetta aren't going to throw $300+ just for Bayonetta 2. A few might but it won't help the sells that much.
Given that this game has higher budget and staff than Bayonetta 1 it guarantees that Bayonetta 2 needs to sell more than its predecessor.
Microsoft is doing some reconstructing/changing and thats just from a X1 blunders.
If the wiiU fails and you don't think massive change will come to Nintendo you're crazy. First thing that will happen is shareholders will call for Iwata to step down. Company wide reconstructing will happen next. Which will result in some people getting fired and new people being brought in.
Well a Legend of Zelda game that look like that CG trailer(the one shown at E3 '11) would be cool but would take time. Miyamoto recently said the reason for Pikman 3 delays were because he was having a hard time with the shaders.
Which possibly mean Nintendo isn't fully ready to go "full next gen."
As far as priced goes WiiU should've been priced at $249 and $299 or cheaper.
Far as hardware goes, developers and publishers during or after E3 '11 or '12 should have sat down and had a talk with Nintendo. Instead they were giving praises like the wiiU was some kind of game changer.
Only played one of those and that was Rumble Roses. My cousin had brought it from GameStop and I tried it. Sadly it wasn't my cup of tea.
Fuhrer King Bradly has the "Ultimate Eye". However it does not work like a Kinect. It doesn't have any abilities that allow the host to spy on people.
"As a Homunculus, Bradley possesses a special kind of power in his left eye, giving him sight abilities that far exceed a regular human's eyesight; allowing him to read an opponent in battle and avoid oncoming attacks with little to no effort." -FMA Wikia
Holy crap we got to choose a side?
Kinect cannot make mmo gaming complete. Shouting commands or spells seems fun at first but can grow dull in short period of time. Honestly core players could care less for such features. I tried it in ME3 and less than 3 minutes I got bored with the feature. Not only that but I don't get how some people get all hype for such features. Voice command functions has been around for all time. Some developers utilized such features or not so much.
While I will admit the idea...
I wouldn't say dying its more like SF5 has yet been put on Capcom's table for approval. Which would explain why the budget and staff isn't there.
@EliteGameKnight
The original title of the article was "The PS4 has nothing to offer." The author has change the title on N4G and his website. Which made it seem the author was doing it for clicks.
If he had the title he has now or something similar you wouldn't see half of the comments you see now and two of the report under "Lame" wouldn't be there.
So something like Star Fox Assault but with improve mechanics?
While MS may or may not re-implement the orginal online policy, I'm pretty sure more publishers(Microsoft included) will be implementing always online requirement into their games somewhere down the road. Just look at Ubisoft two of their next gen titles(The Division and The Crew) have a always online requirement.